Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 19;21:90. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01642-2

Table 2.

Adherence to cardiac rehabilitation program and SIT LESS intervention

Total population (n = 212) Missing values (n (%)) SIT LESS group (n = 108) Control group (n = 104)
Contemporary CR program
Intake consult CR (n (%)) 211 (100%) 0 (0%) 107 (99%) 104 (100%)
Exit consult CR (n (%)) 197 (96%) 7 (3%) 98 (95%) 99 (97%)
Exercise training at CR (yes) (n (%)) 171 (88%) 17 (8%) 85 (88%) 86 (88%)
Supervised exercise sessions (n) 11 [9–11] 0 (0%) 11 [9–11] 11 [9–12]
SIT LESS
Intake consult SIT LESS (n (%)) 107 (99%)
Interim consult SIT LESS (n (%)) 101 (94%)
Exit consult SIT LESS (n (%)) 97 (90%)
SIT LESS telephone coaching sessions total intervention period (n (%)) 7 [6–8]
Duration intervention period (days)* 89 (± 13)
Number of days with ≥ 10 h wear time of activity tracker (days) 71 (± 19)
Adherence to activity tracker (%) 84 [72–94]
Premature discontinuation activity tracker use (n (%)) 11 (11%)
Before interim consult (n (%)) 3 (3%)
After interim consult (n (%)) 8 (8%)

Data are presented as n (%) for categorical variables and as mean (± standard deviation) for normal distributed continuous data or median [interquartile range] for non-normal distributed continuous variables. *patients who did not complete CR - SIT LESS coaching were excluded

CR: Cardiac rehabilitation