Abstract
Disparities in access to health care are persistent and contribute to poor health outcomes for many populations around the world. Barriers to access are often similar across countries, despite differences in how health systems are structured. Health care leaders can work to address these barriers through bold, evidence-based actions. The Future of Health (FOH), an international community of senior health leaders, collaborated with the Duke-Margolis Institute for Health Policy to identify priority organizational and policy actions needed to improve equitable access to health care through a consensus-building exercise, a targeted literature review, and an expert discussion group. This paper describes four key action areas for health care leaders that FOH members identified as critical to enabling the future of equitable access to health care: ensuring prioritization of and accountability for equitable access to care; establishing comprehensive, organization-wide strategies to address barriers to access; clearly defining and incentivizing improvement on key measures related to reducing disparities in access; and establishing cross-sector partnerships to improve equitable access.
Keywords: equitable access to health care, health equity, health care leaders
What can leaders of health organizations do to make access to health care more equitable? This paper describes four main recommendations from international health care leaders.
Introduction
Inequitable access to health care is a persistent, growing challenge around the world, further exposed and exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.1,2 Disparities in access to health care and health outcomes exist within all countries; however, they may vary across countries and types of health and social care systems. Even in high-income countries—of which many have adopted policies to ensure universal health coverage and address the social drivers of health—disparities remain substantial for some subpopulations.3,4 While specific subpopulations can vary by country, people who experience inequitable access to health care can include, but are not limited to, racial and ethnic minorities, indigenous populations, people with complex health conditions and disabilities, migrants and refugees, people with lower socioeconomic status, people who are uninsured or underinsured, rural populations, sexual and gender minority populations, justice-involved populations, and older adults. Inequitable access to health care is one of several contributors to inequities in health.5 People who experience inequitable access to health care often face systematic disadvantages, discrimination, and marginalization more broadly, which impacts access to economic, social, and health resources and downstream health outcomes.6
Despite differences in how health care systems are structured, countries share common barriers to health care access. Several frameworks conceptualize “access to care” through five domains: affordability (eg, out-of-pocket medical costs), accommodation (eg, wait times and hours for appointments), availability (eg, adequacy of provider workforce, capacity to accept new, or uninsured patients), accessibility (eg, travel times), and acceptability (eg, providers' cultural and social characteristics and beliefs).7,8 Broader structural and systemic barriers outside of the health care system can interact with these domains and further impact a person's ability to access health care.6,8 A person may experience barriers in one or multiple of these domains, and a comprehensive view of these barriers is essential to the development and implementation of strategies to achieve equitable access.
With effective leadership and innovative policies, leaders of health care delivery organizations, health insurers, and governmental health departments (“health care leaders”) and policymakers around the world can make substantial contributions to advancing equitable access to health care. This article summarizes four key action areas that international health care leaders identified as critical to advancing equitable access to care. Significant improvements could occur within the next ten years if health care leaders take bold, evidence-based actions while also ensuring ongoing accountability for improving access.
Approach
The Future of Health (FOH), an international community of senior health leaders, collaborated with the Margolis Institute for Health Policy at Duke University to consider how health delivery organizations can advance equitable access to health care. Research activities included a review and synthesis of peer-reviewed and grey literature and qualitative analysis of two discussion groups with a total of 43 unique international health care experts (including academic researchers, health delivery organization leaders and providers, health care payers, governmental health leaders, and commercial vendors) from 12 countries in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America to understand areas of consensus and disagreement. The first discussion group was held virtually in August 2022 with 11 participants to generate input on scoping for the topic. The second took place with 33 participants during FOH's annual summit in October 2022 in Israel. Participants completed a priority ranking exercise to identify the areas in which they as leaders could make the most impact. Participants further discussed these topics and proposed recommendations based on their experiences. For more information about meeting participants and voting process, see the Supplementary material. This paper synthesizes topics and actions FOH leaders identified as important for improving equitable access to health care, supported by findings from our review of the literature.
Key areas for action
FOH members identified four key action areas in which health care leaders can take immediate action to improve equitable access to care in the next 10 years (Table 1).
Table 1.
FOH member recommendations to improve equitable access to health care across four key action areas.
| Action Area | Recommendations |
|---|---|
| Leadership Prioritization and Accountability |
|
| Designing Comprehensive Strategies to Address Disparities |
|
| Defining and Measuring Progress on Improving Access |
|
| Fostering Partnerships that Advance Equitable Access |
|
Leadership prioritization and accountability
FOH members believe health care leaders should make equitable access to care an explicit leadership priority for which they are held to account. Though prioritizing access is a necessary first step, it is not sufficient given that leadership and organizational priorities often change. Accordingly, leaders should be held accountable for making measurable progress towards reducing disparities in access to health care to sustain attention on long-term equitable access goals.9 Boards or other governing bodies should establish meaningful, measurable goals related to improving access and link progress on these goals to leaders' performance reviews and compensation to incentivize progress. For example, Jefferson Health in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania linked a quarter of the chief executive officer (CEO)'s compensation to health equity. Each year, the CEO and board set five parameters to measure progress on equity, which are directly tied to the CEO's compensation as an incentive. Elevance Health, a private health insurance provider in the US, has implemented similar steps by establishing specific performance measures for senior leadership that are linked to equity. Linking an incentive to health care access outcomes can incentivize leaders to dedicate time and attention to strategies that advance equitable access.
Designing comprehensive strategies to address disparities
In tandem with leadership prioritization, FOH members recommend that health care leaders establish comprehensive, organization-wide strategies to address barriers to access and achieve more equitable outcomes. Leading with an intentional strategy ensures efforts are complementary, linked to a common goal, and supported by core leadership. Effective strategies should be informed by data and engagement with patients and communities. Strategies aimed at advancing equitable access to care can include workforce trainings, increasing diversity in leadership and the workforce, patient-centered designs in services and technology, community-based care delivery models, and improvements in data quality.
Examples from FOH members illustrate how such strategies can be established. For example, Henry Ford Health in Detroit, Michigan established the “On the Journey to Equity for All initiative” in 2020 to address barriers to equitable care.10 The plan encompasses numerous components linked to equity, including workforce trainings on implicit biases, building an inclusive and diverse workforce, expanding diversity in leadership and management roles, social advocacy, and providing platforms to learn from the community about barriers to care. Other FOH members are implementing strategies to improve access to care within targeted areas (eg, maternal health, cardiovascular disease, mental, and behavioral health), or particular interventions.11 Leaders should look to progress in these initial strategic areas to broaden their strategies, creating a practical path to ensure that equitable access is embedded across all areas of care delivery and that efforts are synergistic.
Throughout these efforts, health care leaders should also engage with their communities and facilitate platforms to empower and uplift voices of people who experience inequitable access to health care to advocate for policy changes that can further address systemic disparities in access to care. Leaders have the opportunity to amplify the voices and stories of people in underrepresented groups, particularly those in communities who face barriers to interfacing with health systems, which can be highly effective in influencing both organizational and policy-level changes.
Defining, measuring, and incentivizing progress on improving access
FOH members emphasized the importance of defining clear measures of equitable access and tracking progress at both organizational and national levels. Comprehensive strategies to improve access to care require sufficient data to find and reach people who experience inequitable access to health care, as well as to track the progress and impact of efforts. At the same time, FOH members noted that standardized measures of access to care are not widely available.
Health care leaders should undertake efforts to measure the availability and quality of health care services for people who experience inequitable access to health care and track progress towards addressing barriers to access. Such efforts can help to identify barriers to care, inform strategies to address them, and track progress over time. For example, the UK's National Health Service (NHS) created a Healthcare Inequalities Improvement Dashboard to measure, monitor, and inform action on health inequities.12 In the US, nonprofit hospitals and local health agencies regularly complete community health needs assessments (CHNAs) and create implementation strategies to meet identified needs. Many organizations use this process to inform strategies and track progress towards improving the accessibility and quality of services. For example, Beth Israel Lahey Health in Boston, Massachusetts identified equitable access to care as a key priority in its 2022 CHNA, which informed strategies to address barriers to access and metrics to track progress, which are outlined in the system's local hospitals' implementation strategies.13 Policy changes to encourage CHNAs and similar efforts to measure and address disparities in access to care could expand these approaches.14
FOH members also recommend developing and implementing equity-focused quality measures and aligned incentives to support progress and create accountability for addressing barriers in access to care.15 Some countries and payers have implemented financial incentives for making measurable improvements in access to health care through pay-for-performance or more advanced value-based payment programs.16,17 As an example, Australia's Practice Incentives Program provides incentive payments to general practices to improve access to care, including payments for providing after-hours care, providing care in rural or remote areas, and improving care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.18 Similarly, Israel introduced additional payments to incentivize health maintenance organizations to improve quality and access to primary care.19 Implementing measures and incentives like these can help health leaders identify disparities in access, support, and prioritize actions to address them, invest in infrastructure for ongoing assessment and quality improvement, and move towards accountability for reducing disparities.15
Fostering partnerships that advance equitable access
FOH members recommend that health care delivery organizations coordinate and collaborate both within and outside of the health sector to address disparities in access to health care. Cross-sector partnerships involving diverse stakeholders can help create effective, coordinated, and sustainable solutions to drive improvements in access to care—for example, through collective impact.20
Health care leaders should create community-based partnerships to advance models of care in which health care and social services are extended into accessible locations in communities. For example, in the UK, integrated care systems bring together the NHS, social care providers, community- and faith-based organizations, and other partners to coordinate local services and resources to improve local health and well-being and address inequities in health access, outcomes, and experiences.21 The NHS also released implementation guidance for integrated care systems to engage communities in their efforts, especially people who face barriers to accessing care and people with poor experiences and outcomes.22 Some FOH members' organizations have also initiated community partnerships to address barriers to equitable access. For example, Jefferson Health created the Jefferson Collaborative for Health Equity, a network of partners from the health system, community- and faith-based organizations, businesses, and advocates, to address challenges related to health inequities in the Philadelphia area. The Collaborative invests in innovative solutions that make health care services more accessible while also strengthening the capacity of community organizations. Through one initiative, the Collaborative is partnering with local community health organizations to create community health care hubs, where people can access health care and social services and education.23
FOH members encourage identifying opportunities to establish innovative, disruptive partnerships beyond the traditional health sector, such as with technology companies, retailers, and industry to collaborate on shared goals related to equitable access to care. These stakeholders can play a significant role in shaping access to health care and social services.24,25 FOH members recognize that processes to form partnerships, particularly with other sectors, can be difficult to navigate. The Ottawa Hospital in Canada established an internal partnership framework guided by the Quadruple Aim to aid in developing partnerships with companies offering health-related technologies and services to improve care which may serve as an example for other groups entering partnerships. The framework allows partners to collaboratively work through their priorities, planned initiatives, roles and expectations, and expected outcomes.26
Moving forward, health care leaders can play an important role in driving and advocating for bold changes to create, scale, and sustain innovative partnerships that build on clear shared strategic goals. Leaders can simultaneously advocate for policy supports and incentives to facilitate effective and sustainable cross-sector collaborations.25 In particular, adequate funding and aligned incentives are needed to promote collaboration and sustainable activities around shared goals.
Conclusion
Health care leaders across the FOH community firmly believe that advancing equitable access to health care is essential for redesigning the FOH. The above recommendations reflect international health care leaders' experiences and lessons and set out clear, immediate actions that other health care leaders and policymakers around the world can take to advance equitable access to health care. Improving access to health care for all paves the way for better health outcomes and a healthier population in the future.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge Oranit Ido and Jonathan Gonzalez-Smith for their contributions to this work. Ryan Noach was employed by Discovery Health when this work was performed.
Contributor Information
Beth Boyer, Duke-Margolis Institute for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States.
Katie Huber, Duke-Margolis Institute for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States.
Eyal Zimlichman, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel.
Robert Saunders, Duke-Margolis Institute for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States.
Mark McClellan, Duke-Margolis Institute for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States.
Charles Kahn, Federation of American Hospitals, Washington, DC 20001, United States.
Ryan Noach, Discovery Health, Sandton 2146, South Africa.
Claudia Salzberg, Future of Health, Washington, DC 20001, United States.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material is available at Health Affairs Scholar online.
Funding
This study was funded by The Future of Health, LLC. The Future of Health, LLC, was involved in all stages of this research, including study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, and the preparation of this manuscript.
Notes
- 1. World Health Organization . Health inequities and their causes. Published February 22, 2018. Accessed May 6, 2024. https://www.who.int/news-room/facts-in-pictures/detail/health-inequities-and-their-causes
- 2. Paremoer L, Nandi S, Serag H, Baum F. Covid-19 pandemic and the social determinants of health. BMJ. 2021;372:n129. 10.1136/bmj.n129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Pan American Health Organization . Just societies: health equity and dignified lives. Commission of the Pan American Health Organization on equity and health inequalities in the Americas. 2019. Accessed May 6, 2024. https://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/51571
- 4. OECD . Health for Everyone? Social Inequalities in Health and Health Systems. OECD. 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 5. Whitehead M, Dahlgren G.. Levelling up (part 1): a discussion paper on concepts and principles for tackling social inequities in health. WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2006. Accessed May 6, 2024. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/107790
- 6. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine . The root causes of health inequity. In: Communities in Action: Pathways to Health Equity. National Academies Press; 2017:24624. 10.17226/24624 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kullgren JT, McLaughlin CG. Beyond affordability: the impact of nonfinancial barriers on access for uninsured adults in three diverse communities. J Community Health. 2010;35(3):240–248. 10.1007/s10900-010-9230-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Levesque JF, Harris MF, Russell G. Patient-centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations. Int J Equity Health. 2013;12(1):18. 10.1186/1475-9276-12-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. O’Kane M, Agrawal S, Binder L, et al. An equity agenda for the field of health care quality improvement. NAM Perspect. 2021;2021:10.31478/202109b. 10.31478/202109b [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Brooks-Williams D. An effective response to healthcare disparities begins with a strategic plan. Front Health Serv Manage. 2022;39(2):27–31. 10.1097/HAP.0000000000000153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. NHS Race & Health Observatory . Driving race equity in health and care: strategy 2021–2024. Accessed May 6, 2024. https://www.nhsrho.org/about-us/our-strategy/
- 12. NHS England . The Healthcare Inequalities Improvement Dashboard. Accessed May 6, 2024. https://www.england.nhs.uk/about/equality/equality-hub/national-healthcare-inequalities-improvement-programme/data-and-insight/hi-improvement-dashboard/
- 13. Beth Israel Lahey Health . 2022 Community health needs assessment. 2022. Accessed May 6, 2024. https://bilh.org/-/media/files/bilh/bilh-chna-2022.pdf
- 14. Rozier M, Goold S, Singh S. How should nonprofit hospitals' community benefit be more responsive to health disparities? AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(3):E273–E280. 10.1001/amajethics.2019.273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Anderson AC, O’Rourke E, Chin MH, Ponce NA, Bernheim SM, Burstin H. Promoting health equity and eliminating disparities through performance measurement and payment. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018;37(3):371–377. 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. NEJM Catalyst . What is pay for performance in healthcare? Published online March 1, 2018. Accessed May 6, 2024. https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.18.0245
- 17. Bleser WK, Pokam Tchuisseu Y, Shen H, Thoumi A, Kaye DR, Saunders RS. Advancing equity through value-based payment: implementation and evaluation to support design goals. Health Aff Forefr. 2022. Accessed May 6, 2024. https://www.healthaffairs.org/content/forefront/advancing-equity-through-value-based-payment-implementation-andevaluation-support [Google Scholar]
- 18. Services Australia . Practice Incentives Program. Published 2023. Accessed May 6, 2024. https://www.servicesaustralia.gov.au/practice-incentives-program
- 19. OECD . Realising the Potential of Primary Health Care. 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Kania J, Williams J, Schmitz P, Brady S, Kramer M, Juster JS. Centering equity in collective impact. Stanf Soc Innov Rev. 2021;20:3845. 10.48558/RN5M-CA77 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21. NHS England . What are integrated care systems? Accessed May 6, 2024. https://www.england.nhs.uk/integratedcare/what-is-integrated-care/
- 22. NHS England . Building strong integrated care systems everywhere: ICS implementation guidance on working with people and communities. 2021. Accessed May 6, 2024. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/B0661-ics-working-with-people-and-communities.pdf
- 23. Jefferson Health . Jefferson collaborative for health equity. Accessed January 8, 2024. https://www.jeffersonhealth.org/about-us/community/collaborative-health-equity
- 24. Marmot M, Allen JJ. Social determinants of health equity. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(Suppl 4):S517–S519. 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Towe VL, Leviton L, Chandra A, Sloan JC, Tait M, Orleans T. Cross-sector collaborations and partnerships: essential ingredients to help shape health and well-being. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016;35(11):1964–1969. 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Bodenheimer T, Sinsky C. From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(6):573–576. 10.1370/afm.1713 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
