Table 3.
The optimal on-time and optimal uniform array spacing for 16 element TMLA design.
Algorithms | Optimal on-time (τnn) | Optimal uniform spacing (d) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSO | 0.1839 | 0.2277 | 0.4267 | 0.5826 | 0.6491 | 0.8676 | 0.9474 | 0.9806 | 0.8042λ |
0.9640 | 0.9059 | 0.7921 | 0.6613 | 0.4913 | 0.3703 | 0.2390 | 0.1193 | ||
FFA | 0.1266 | 0.2584 | 0.4095 | 0.5514 | 0.7018 | 0.8372 | 0.9481 | 0.9702 | 0.8323λ |
0.9863 | 0.8967 | 0.7887 | 0.6495 | 0.4959 | 0.3267 | 0.1934 | 0.1758 | ||
HBMO | 0.1369 | 0.2558 | 0.3685 | 0.5146 | 0.6795 | 0.8114 | 0.8791 | 0.9507 | 0.8398λ |
0.9125 | 0.8691 | 0.7443 | 0.5859 | 0.4759 | 0.2938 | 0.2013 | 0.1147 | ||
BAT | 0.1010 | 0.1456 | 0.2951 | 0.4083 | 0.5873 | 0.7295 | 0.8591 | 0.9597 | 0.8624λ |
0.9735 | 0.9724 | 0.8572 | 0.7472 | 0.5807 | 0.3994 | 0.2943 | 0.1589 | ||
GWO | 0.1127 | 0.2018 | 0.3023 | 0.4628 | 0.6057 | 0.7362 | 0.8685 | 0.9246 | 0.8701λ |
0.9384 | 0.8850 | 0.7937 | 0.6570 | 0.4831 | 0.3510 | 0.1992 | 0.1318 | ||
WOA | 0.1172 | 0.2172 | 0.3485 | 0.5194 | 0.6790 | 0.8399 | 0.9527 | 1.0000 | 0.8882λ |
0.9951 | 0.9138 | 0.7825 | 0.6345 | 0.4535 | 0.3030 | 0.1671 | 0.0987 | ||
DO | 0.1022 | 0.1862 | 0.3074 | 0.4655 | 0.6352 | 0.7944 | 0.9182 | 0.9978 | 0.8899λ |
1.0000 | 0.9642 | 0.8468 | 0.6940 | 0.5341 | 0.3776 | 0.2200 | 0.1342 | ||
CENDO | 0.0997 | 0.1834 | 0.3265 | 0.4744 | 0.6504 | 0.8014 | 0.9353 | 0.9961 | 0.8879λ |
0.9993 | 0.9288 | 0.8180 | 0.6546 | 0.4927 | 0.3151 | 0.1934 | 0.1054 |
Significant values are in [bold].