Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 19;14:19144. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70192-1

Table 5.

Comparison of different SpO2 estimation method.

Model MAE (%) RMSE (%) Pearson
ROR8 4.13 4.77 None
Standard ROR12 2.43 3.75 None
convLSTM and ViViT18 1.51 1.61 0.362
CL-SPO2NET19 1.83 1.73 0.401
CNN with Efficient-B320 1.42 1.71 0.372
ResNet18 and MMTM22 1.23 1.52 0.471
MMFM25 1.04 1.48 0.354
Temporal convolution31 1.71 2.29 0.409
ITSCAN 1.10 1.19 0.375