Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 12;13(3):493–528. doi: 10.1007/s40119-024-00377-2

Table 3.

Data from recent trials in larger cohorts

First author references (year) Cases/participants Age, years Follow-up, years (unless otherwise indicated) Study type Key findings/messages
Gillinov et al. [33]

260 persistent or longstanding persistent AF patients who were to undergo mitral valve surgery were

randomized to maze surgery or PVI only versus no AF surgery

69 ± 10 6-month assessment and 12-month assessment Randomized multi-center study

Significantly more patients in the ablation group were free of AF at 6 and 12 months (P < 0.001)

More permanent pacemaker placement required in surgical group

Ablative energy sources were not uniform and may have reduced success rates

Suwalski et al. [39]

11,381 patients with AF underwent mitral valve surgery (MVS)

2449 (21.5%) also underwent AF surgical ablation

65.6 ± 9.0 Median follow-up 5 years Retrospectively collected data from the KROK (Polish National Registry of Cardiac Surgery Procedures) registry

AF surgical ablation group was younger (63.8 ± 8.7 years vs. 66.1 ± 9.0 years; p < 0.001)

MVS + AF ablation resulted in significant survival benefit over MVS alone (p < 0.001)

Malaisrie et al. [37] Data from the 9771 CABG patients treated with surgical ablation were compared with 9,771 CABG patients who were not surgically ablated 74 Median follow-up 4 years A one-to-one optimal matching algorithm was employed to obtain propensity score matched samples

Operative and in hospital mortality were significantly higher in the ablation group

Among patients surviving past 2 years mortality and incidence of stroke or systemic embolization was lower in the ablation group

Suwalski et al. [38] 306 cases of isolated CABG + ablation versus 918 of isolated CABG alone Median 62 4.7 ± 3.5 years

1:3 propensity matching

Data collected retrospectively from the KROK (Polish National Registry of Cardiac Surgery Procedures) registry

CABG + ablation was associated with a statistically lower risk of 30-day death (P = 0.032)

Performing ablation at the time of isolated CABG was also associated with a significant long-term survival benefit (P = 0.008)

Musharbash et al. [40]

10,859 total

AF + Cox-maze IV 438

AF—Cox-maze IV 1510

No AF 8911

After matching:

AF + Cox-maze IV = 68 ± 11

versus

AF w/o Cox-maze IV = 68 ± 14

AF + Cox-maze IV = 66 ± 11

versus

No AF = 66 ± 12

Mean follow-up between the AF + Cox-maze IV and AF w/o Cox-maze IV groups was 4.2 ± 3.4 years and 3.8 ± 3.8 years. Between the AF + Cox-maze IV and the No AF group was 4.0 ± 3.4 years and 3.9 ± 3.8 years Retrospective review of patients undergoing cardiac surgery 2001 to 2016 with propensity matching

Survival greater with concomitant Cox-maze IV compared to AF that was untreated

No significant difference in 10-year survival between Cox-maze IV recipients and the group without AF

Iribarne et al. [41] 2740 with documented pre-op AF

Surgical ablation recipients 71.7

No ablation

patients 71.9

Mean long-term survival follow-up was 2.6 years Retrospective multicenter cohort of patients with AF who underwent CABG, valve, and valve plus CABG comparing surgical ablation versus no surgical ablation

No differences in postoperative complications

Length of stay shorter in ablation recipients (p < 0.001)

Ablated patients had improved 5-year survival

Badhwar et al. [42]

86,941 total 42,066 (48.3%)

underwent surgical ablation

28,739 pairs were propensity matched

Median (interquartile range)*

Overall: 72 (65–79)

No ablation: 73 (65–80)

Ablation: 71 (64–78)

47 months** US surgical ablative propensity matched performance trends for six operative categories: 1) AVR ± CABG, 2) MVRR ± CABG, 3) AVR with MVRR, 4) CABG alone, 5) stand-alone surgical ablation, and 6) surgical ablation plus other concomitant operations Risk-adjusted mortality, stroke, and prolonged ventilation were reduced in ablation recipients. However, renal failure and new pacemakers were increased after surgical ablation

US United States, AF atrial fibrillation, AVR aortic valve replacement, CABG coronary artery bypass graft surgery, MVRR mitral valve repair or replacement, MVS mitral valve surgery, PVI pulmonary-vein isolation, w/o without. *Unadjusted values. **Ill-defined in original manuscript