Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 22;44(9):936–945. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjae068

Table 3.

Aesthetic vs Reconstructive Subgroup Analysis: Systemic Complications per Patient

Aesthetic (N = 3826) Reconstructive (N = 2412) P-value
Any adverse event 4.34% (166) 6.76% (163) <.0001b
DVT or PE 0.03% (1) 0.08% (2) .5635
Pneumothorax 0.05% (2) 0.00% (0) .5256
Bleeding requiring transfusion 0.03% (1) 0.08% (2) .5635
Cardiac complications 0.00% (0) 0.08% (2) .1495
Respiratory complications 0.03% (1) 0.08% (2) .5635
Need for antibiotics 0.94% (36) 2.20% (53) <.0001b
 Oral 88.89% (32) 66.04% (35) .0229b,a
 Intravenous 11.11% (4) 33.96% (18)
Unplanned ER visit 0.03% (1) 0.54% (13) <.0001b
Unplanned hospital admission 0.16% (6) 1.04% (25) <.0001b
Unplanned return to OR 1.57% (60) 2.11% (51) .1163

Values are % (n). DVT, deep vein thrombosis; ER, emergency room; OR, operating room; PE, pulmonary embolism. aComparison of oral/intravenous distribution between patient cohorts. bStatistically significant.