Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 23;27(8):110564. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110564

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of the MG patients included in the study

All MG EOMG LOMG
Total patients 98 46 52

Sex

F 60 (61.2%) 37 (80.4%) 23 (44.2%)
M 38 (38.8%) 9 (19.6%) 29 (55.8%)
Mean age (y) 61.0 (44.2–72.0) 43.5 (34.0–51.8) 72.0 (65.8–77.0)
Disease duration (y)b 5.8 (2.0–11.0) 7.5 (3.4–13.6) 4.0 (2.0–8.8)
MG-ADL 2 (0–5) 3 (0–6) 1 (0–4)
MGC 4 (0–9.75) 5 (0–11) 2 (0–7)
Thymectomy 24 (24.5%) 19 (41.3%) 5 (9.6%)
Thymoma 14 10 4
Hyperplasia 6 5 1

Immunosuppressive treatments

Yes 70 (71.4%) 34 (73.9%) 36 (69.2%)
No 28 (28.6%) 12 (26.1%) 16 (30.8%)

Current treatmenta

AChEI (only) 20 (20.4%) 9 (19.6%) 11 (21.2%)
Prednisone 53 30 23
Azathioprine 29 15 14
Tacrolimus 1 1 0
Rituximab 3 2 1
IvIg 2 2 0
Mycophenolate mofetil 5 4 1
Methotrexate 8 4 4

Age, disease duration, and MG-ADL are presented as median with interquartile range. Abbreviations: F, female; M, male; y, years; EOMG, early-onset myasthenia gravis; LOMG, late-onset myasthenia gravis; MG-ADL, myasthenia gravis activities of daily living; MGC, Myasthenia Gravis Composite score; AChEI, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors; IvIg; intravenous immunoglobulins.

a

The number of detailed immunosuppressive treatments does not add up to 100% since several patients have a combination of many immunosuppressive agents.

b

EOMG and LOMG significantly differed in disease duration; unpaired t test; p = 0.0007.