Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 31;10(15):e35557. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35557

Table 2.

Cr removal comparison using different materials.

No. Materials Optimum pH Adsorption capacity (mg/g) Contact time (min) Reference
1 Chitosan–magnetic biochar (from loofah) 3 28 n.a [8]
2 Spent tea leaves treated with ascorbic acid 2 93 n.a [19]
3 Magnetic–activated carbon from rice husk 2 10 120 [15]
4 Commercial activated carbon from wood 2 242 n.a [7]
5 CMAT 2 200 90 this study