Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar-Apr;20(2):41–49. doi: 10.48305/arya.2023.41893.2906

Table 2.

Comparison of 2D-STE measures for RV between two groups of study.

Variables PS (n=24) Control (n=25) P value
Strain
Global -16.10 ± 5.37 -22.15 ± 2.86 0.001
Apical lateral -17.10 ± 10.91 -13.48 ± 7.31 0.178
Middle lateral -19.66 ± 12.0 -22.32 ± 4.13 0.302
Basal lateral -23.26 ± 12.58 -23.74 ± 5.90 0.863
Apical septal -15.17 ± 5.80 -9.89 ± 9.52 0.024
Middle septal -15.32 ± 3.88 -22.70 ± 6.78 0.001
Basal septal -19.89 ± 7.35 -37.21 ± 10.76 0.001
Strain rate
Global 2.05 ± 0.75 2.15 ± 0.43 0.580
Apical lateral 2.77 ± 0.90 1.65 ± 1.60 0.001
Middle lateral 3.21 ± 1.83 1.79 ± 1.62 0.007
Basal lateral 3.65 ± 2.24 0.78 ± 2.59 0.001
Apical septal 2.14 ± 0.68 0.23 ± 2.22 0.001
Middle septal 2.20 ± 0.68 1.79 ± 1.91 0.324
Basal septal 2.87 ± 1.09 3.87 ± 2.51 0.079
TAPSE 14.09 ± 4.49 18.48 ± 2.77 0.001
LVEF 74.20 ± 6.48 75.16 ± 7.07 0.626

2D-STE, two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography; LVEF, left ventricular

ejection fraction; PS, pulmonary stenosis; RV, right ventricle; TAPSE, tricuspid annular

plane systolic excursion.

Continuous data are presented as mean ± standard deviation and analyzed using independent student t

test. P ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.