TABLE 4.
Relationship of secondary peristalsis (FLIP contractile response) and primary peristalsis (HRM) on follow-up testing after fundoplication.
HRM CCv4.0 peristalsis patterns | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Normal | Ineffective esophageal motility | Absent contractility | Hypercontractile | Premature | Total | ||
FLIP contractile Response | Normal | 10 (16) | 0 (0)* | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | 11 (17) |
Borderline | 14 (22) | 5 (8) | 1 (2) | 2 (3) | 0 (0) | 22 (35) | |
Impaired/disordered | 12 (19) | 6 (10) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | 20 (32) | |
Absent | 1 (2) | 3 (5) | 5 (8)* | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 9 (14) | |
Spastic reactive | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | |
Total | 37 (59) | 14 (22) | 7 (11) | 3 (5) | 2 (3) | 63 (100) |
Note: Values in each cell are n (% of the total cohort that completed both high-resolution manometry (HRM) and functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP)).
p <0.05 in comparison to normal primary peristalsis.
Abbreviation: CCv4.0 – Chicago Classification version 4.0.