Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 2;46(5):4017–4035. doi: 10.1007/s11357-024-01233-w

Table 2.

Effects of shifting Canton-S female flies from a low (L)- to a high (H)-calorie diet on longevity compared to longevity of flies on lifelong low-calorie diet

Food Time on L diet N
(n censored)
Mean LS
(% change)
X2 p Maximal LS
(% change)
L Lifelong 439 (6) 89.3 (− 48) 751.9572  < 0.0001* 110.6 (− 38)
H Lifelong 402 (12) 46.7 68.2
L Lifelong 439 (6) 89.3 (− 44) 565.7714  < 0.0001* 110.6 (− 31)
LHD20 D20 207 (6) 49.8 76.3
L Lifelong 439 (6) 89.3 (− 35) 526.5062  < 0.0001* 110.6 (− 30)
LHD50 D50 226 (4) 58.0 77.9
L Lifelong 439 (6) 89.3 (− 31) 454.1635  < 0.0001* 110.6 (− 26)
LHD60 D60 218 (6) 62.0 82.2

L low-calorie diet, H high-calorie diet, LHD20 flies shifted from a low- to high-calorie diet at day 20, LHD50 flies shifted from a low- to a high-calorie diet at day 50, LHD60 flies shifted from a low- to a high-calorie diet at day 60, N number of flies in experiments used for calculating mean and maximal lifespan, n censored number of flies that died between 0 and 10 days, and are not included in listed N and are not included in calculation of mean and maximal lifespan. The total number of flies in experiments on day 0 is N plus n flies)

*Statistically significant