Skip to main content
. 2024 May 16;49(9):3241–3250. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04359-9

Table 3.

Statistical parameters of the analyzed #Enzian compartments for the evaluation of the preoperative #Enzian score assessed by MRI in comparison to the surgical #Enzian score with histopathological validation as gold standard in 45 patients

#Enzian compartment ACC 95% CI Cohen’s kappa SENS SPEC PPV NPV
P 0.36 (0.22–0.51) 0.08 0.17 1.00 1.00 0.26
O_left 0.98 (0.88–1.00) 0.94 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.97
O_right 0.98 (0.88–1.00) 0.92 1.00 0.97 0.88 1.00
T_left 0.89 (0.76–0.96) 0.67 1.00 0.87 0.58 1.00
T_right 0.93 (0.82–0.99) 0.69 1.00 0.93 0.57 1.00
A 0.89 (0.76–0.96) 0.71 0.90 0.89 0.69 0.97
B_left 0.84 (0.71–0.94) 0.59 0.62 0.94 0.80 0.86
B_right 0.84 (0.71–0.94) 0.67 0.81 0.86 0.76 0.89
C 0.96 (0.85–0.99) 0.83 0.86 0.97 0.86 0.97
FA 0.87 (0.73–0.95) 0.66 0.75 0.91 0.75 0.91

P peritoneum, O ovary, T tubal-ovarian condition, A vagina and rectovaginal, B sacrouterine/cardinal ligaments, pelvic sidewall, C rectum, FA adenomyosis

ACC accuracy, 95% CI 95% confidence interval, SENS sensitivity, SPEC specificity, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value