Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 2;27(5):1088–1099. doi: 10.1007/s10120-024-01524-3

Table 4.

External validation of trained AI model

Prediction target Patient-based performance (n/N)
Undifferentiated histology
 Accuracy (%) 75.6 (183/242)
 Sensitivity (%) 81.7 (67/82)
 Specificity (%) 72.5 (116/160)
 PPV (%) 60.4 (67/111)
 NPV (%) 88.6 (116/131)
Submucosal invasion
 Accuracy (%) 71.9 (174/242)
 Sensitivity (%) 53.3 (41/77)
 Specificity (%) 80.6 (133/169)
 PPV (%) 56.2 (41/73)
 NPV (%) 78.2 (133/169)
Lymphovascular invasion
 Accuracy (%) 88.8 (215/242)
 Sensitivity (%) 31.8 (7/22)
 Specificity (%) 94.5 (208/220)
 PPV (%) 36.8 (7/19)
 NPV (%) 93.3 (208/223)
Lymph node metastasis
 Accuracy (%) 87.0 (131/153)
 Sensitivity (%) 10.0 (2/20)
 Specificity (%) 98.5 (129/133)
 PPV (%) 50.0 (2/4)
 NPV (%) 86.6 (129/149)

AI artificial intelligence, PPV positive prediction value, NPV negative prediction value, n number of correct predictions, N number of patients