Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 15;2012(2):CD006378. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006378.pub2

Hüll 1999.

Methods Double blind randomised controlled trial, 6 months
Participants 10 Participants (7 intervention, 3 control) who had AD diagnosis, unclear if they were out‐patient or in‐patient, in Germany, aged 55‐75
Interventions Intervention: Piroxicam‐B‐cyclodextrin 10 mg oral once
Control: Placebo
Outcomes Cognition (ADAScog 0‐70 lower score = improvement) at 6 months
Notes Sources of funding not stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No information
Comment:
probably not done
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information
Comment: Probably not done
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote 1: all patients received either 10 mg piroxicam B Cyclodextrin or placebo
Comment:
Probably done, but there is only information for participants
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment:
Reasons for missing outcome data unlikely to be related to true outcome
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Only report ADAS‐cog
Comment:
not all of the study’s pre‐specified primary outcomes have been reported. The study report fails to include results for a key outcome that would be expected to have been reported for such a study
Other bias High risk Comment:  had a potential source of bias related to the specific study design used
Selection bias due to baseline imbalance