Table 2.
Association between METS-VF and osteoarthritis analyzed using logistic regression
| Model | Quartiles of METS-VF | p for trend | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | ||
| Model 1 | 1 | 2.15 (1.58−2.91) | 3.07 (2.30−4.10) | 3.90 (2.94−5.15) | < 0.01 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 1.40 (1.02−1.94) | 1.84 (1.35−2.51) | 2.27 (1.67−3.08) | < 0.01 |
| Model 3 | 1 | 1.43 (1.02−2.01) | 1.93 (1.39−2.69) | 2.33 (1.65−3.28) | < 0.01 |
Model 1:no covariates were adjusted
Model 2: adjusted for age and gender
Model 3: adjusted for age, gender, race, education level, poverty-to-income ratio, alcohol intake, smoking status, work intensity, recreational intensity, serum calcium level, vitamin D level, hypertension, diabetes, and coronary heart disease, energy