Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 8;15:1453601. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1453601

Table 4.

Effect of PLN and LNPR risk stratification on cervical recurrence types of stage T1 papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Recurrence Variables Unadjusted Adjusted a
type OR (95%CI) P OR (95%CI) P
RT
HPLN vs. LPLN 0.63(0.20-1.69) 0.388 1.75(0.64-5.54) 0.299
LN
HPLN vs. LPLN 0.25(0.12-0.52) <0.001 0.27(0.12-0.55) <0.001
RT+LN
HPLN vs. LPLN 0.10(0.03-0.25) <0.001 0.10(0.03-27.00) <0.001
RT
HLNPR vs. LLNPR 1.42(0.49-3.69) 0.489 0.70(0.27-2.07) 0.492
LN
HLNPR vs. LLNPR 0.19(0.09-0.39) <0.001 0.19(0.09-0.40) <0.001
RT+LN
HLNPR vs. LLNPR 0.16(0.07-0.34) <0.001 0.17(0.07-37.30) <0.001

RT, residual thyroid; LN, lymph node; HPLN, high positive lymph node; LPLN, low positive lymph node; HLNPR, high lymph node positive ratio; LLNPR, low lymph node positive ratio;

a

Adjusted for gender, age, T stage, Capsular invasion, Hashimoto thyroiditis and Multifocal.