Table 4:
Risk of bias assessment (ROBINS-I tool)
|
Risk of bias assessment (ROBINS-I tool) Author: Pani, 15 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Domain | Risk | Comment |
| Bias due to confounding | Low risk | No confounding expected |
| Bias in selection of participants into the study | Low risk | Same selection criteria applied through out |
| Bias in classification of interventions | Low risk | Intervention status is well defined |
| Bias due to deviations from intended interventions | Low risk | There were no deviations from the intended interventions |
| Bias due to missing data | Low risk | Data were reasonably complete |
| Bias in measurement of outcomes | Low risk | The methods of outcome assessment were comparable across intervention groups |
| Bias in selection of the reported result | Low risk | There is clear evidence that all reported results correspond to all intended outcomes, analyses and subcohorts |
| Overall judgement | Low risk | – |