Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 8;12:1398330. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1398330

Table 5.

Influencing mechanism (mediation) analysis: Patients’ support.

Variables Model 7 Model 8 Model 9
Job performance Patients’ support Job performance
A.I. application 0.2278*** 0.4076*** 0.1534**
(0.0663) (0.0502) (0.0719)
Individual variables Controlled Controlled Controlled
Human capital variables Controlled Controlled Controlled
Work variables Controlled Controlled Controlled
Patients’ support 0.1827**
−0.0714
Constant term −1.1796*** 0.4921 −1.2695***
(0.4476) (0.3392) (0.4453)
Observations 344 344 344
Results of bootstrapping (patients’ support)
Mediation effect coefficient (bs_1) 0.0744**(Z = 2.39)
Direct effect coefficient (bs_2) 0.1534**(Z = 2.12)
The proportion of the mediation effect 0.3268

*, **, *** represent significance at the 10, 5, and 1% levels, respectively. The figures in brackets are standard errors.