Table 2.
Testing the mediation effect of individual obligation belief in the relationship between individualizing moral foundations and prosocial intentions toward Ukrainians (gender controlled)
Dependent variable: Individual obligation belief, F(2, 129) = 3.58, p < .05 | |||||||
B [95% CI] | SE | t | p | R 2 | |||
Gender | –.04 [–.23; .15] | .10 | –0.46 | .645 | .05 | ||
Individualizing moral foundations | .21 [.02; .40] | .09 | 2.19 | .030 | |||
Dependent variable: Prosocial intentions toward Ukrainians, F(3, 128) = 39.51, p < .001 | |||||||
B [95% CI] | SE | t | p | R 2 | |||
Gender | –.06 [–.20; .08] | .07 | –0.83 | .410 | .48 | ||
Individualizing moral foundations | .09 [–.05; .23] | .07 | 1.27 | .206 | |||
Individual obligation belief | .65 [.53; .78] | .07 | 10.00 | < .001 | |||
Indirect effects on prosocial intentions toward Ukrainians (gender controlled) | |||||||
Effect [95% CI] | Boot SE | ||||||
Individualizing moral foundations → Individual obligation belief → Prosocial intentions toward Ukrainians | .14 [.02; .27] | .06 | |||||
Total indirect effect of Individualizing moral foundations on Prosocial intentions toward Ukrainians | .23 [.04; .41] | .09 |