Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 16;12(3):217–224. doi: 10.5114/cipp/177007

Table 2.

Testing the mediation effect of individual obligation belief in the relationship between individualizing moral foundations and prosocial intentions toward Ukrainians (gender controlled)

Dependent variable: Individual obligation belief, F(2, 129) = 3.58, p < .05
B [95% CI] SE t p R 2
Gender –.04 [–.23; .15] .10 –0.46 .645 .05
Individualizing moral foundations .21 [.02; .40] .09 2.19 .030
Dependent variable: Prosocial intentions toward Ukrainians, F(3, 128) = 39.51, p < .001
B [95% CI] SE t p R 2
Gender –.06 [–.20; .08] .07 –0.83 .410 .48
Individualizing moral foundations .09 [–.05; .23] .07 1.27 .206
Individual obligation belief .65 [.53; .78] .07 10.00 < .001
Indirect effects on prosocial intentions toward Ukrainians (gender controlled)
Effect [95% CI] Boot SE
Individualizing moral foundations → Individual obligation belief → Prosocial intentions toward Ukrainians .14 [.02; .27] .06
Total indirect effect of Individualizing moral foundations on Prosocial intentions toward Ukrainians .23 [.04; .41] .09