Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 22;14(36):26648–26658. doi: 10.1039/d4ra04961f

Comparison of the proposed method with some reported methods for detecting As3+a.

Detection method Linear range (μg L−1) LOD (μg L−1) Recovery (%) Reference
Hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry 0.1–10 0.023 96.7–105 11
Electrochemistry (AuNPs/SPGE) 100–150 30 90.1–109.7 14
Fluorescence detection (MSA-CdTe QDs) 50–1000 16 92.0–112.0 17
Colorimetry (LS-AuNPs) 5–500 2 20
Colorimetry (citrate-AuNPs) 4–100 1.8 95.0–102.8 21
Colorimetry (glucose-AuNPs) 20–500 5.6 28
Colorimetry (GSH-DTT-CYs-PDCA-AuNPs) 2–20 2.5 77.4–128.2 29
Colorimetry (Ars-3 aptamer-CTAB-AuNPs) 1–100 16.9 95.6–107.3 30
Colorimetry (polyethylene glycol-AuNPs) 5–20 5 31
Colorimetry (CS/AuNPs@TDA) 10–1000 6.1 88.2–105.7 Present work
a

AuNPs/SPGE = gold nanoparticles/screen-printed graphene electrode; MSA-CdTe QDs = mercaptosuccinic acid-capped CdTe quantum dots; LS = lauryl sulphate; GSH-DTT-CYs-PDCA = glutathione-dithiothreitol-l-cysteine-2,6-pyridinedicarboxylicacid; CTAB = cetyltrimethylammonium bromide.