Table 3. Objective #3 assessing concordance of the 5-SENSE Score with the expert decisions made in the multidisciplinary team discussion leading to four different scenarios.

Multidisciplinary team meeting		5-SENSE Score		Notes
+	Decision to perform SEEG	+	Points to a focal SOZ→ encourages SEEG	Concordant. Both MDT and 5-SENSE Score reach the same conclusion
+	Decision to perform SEEG	–	Points to non-focal SOZ→ against SEEG	We can assess if indeed the MTD decision or the 5 Sense score were concordant with the SEEG outcome
–	Decision against SEEG	–	Points to non-focal SOZ→ against SEEG	Concordant. Both MDT and 5-SENSE Score reach same conclusion
–	Decision against SEEG	+	Points to a focal SOZ→ encourages SEEG	No further conclusion can be drawn as we have no ground truth

MDTmultidisciplinary team discussionSEEGstereoelectroencephalographySOZseizure-onset zone