Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 22;16(7):e65161. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65161

Table 3. Assessment of the risk of bias.

Author Bias due to confounding Bias in the selection of participants in the study Bias in the classification of interventions Bias due to deviations from intended interventions Bias due to missing data Bias in the measurement of outcomes Bias in the selection of the reported result Overall bias
Villa et al., 2007 [12] 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 16
Pirelli et al., 2004 [13] 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 12
Villa et al., 2002 [14] 2 3 2 2 1 2 2 14
Guilleminault et al., 2011 [15] 2 3 1 2 3 3 1 14
Marino et al., 2012 [16] 2 3 2 2 2 1 2 14
Pirelli et al., 2012 [17] 2 2 1 1 3 1 2 10
Cozza et al., 2004 [18] 2 2 3 2 1 2 2 14
Caruso et al., 2023 [19] 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 16
Pirelli e al., 2015 [20] 2 3 1 2 2 3 1 13
Villa Met al., 2015 [21] 2 3 1 1 2 1 1 11
Pirelli et al., 2019 [22] 2 3 1 2 3 3 1 14
Pirelli et al., 2021 [23] 2 2 1 1 3 1 2 10
Kim et al., 2022 [24] 2 2 3 2 1 2 2 14
Li et al., 2022 [25] 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 16
Chuang et al., 2019 [26] 2 3 1 2 2 3 1 13
Ghodke et al., 2014 [27] 2 3 1 1 2 1 1 11
Machado-Júnior et al., 2016 [28] 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 16
Concepción Medina et al., 2022 [29] 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 12
Zhang et al., 2013 [30] 2 3 2 2 1 2 2 14
Zhao et al., 2018 [31] 2 3 1 2 3 3 1 14
Zreaqat et al., 2023 [32] 2 3 2 2 2 1 2 14