Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 22;23:307. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02396-8

Table 4.

The prognostic value of the TyG index, eGDR, and their combination for mortality

Harrell’s C-index p value aAdjusted Harrell’s C-index
All-cause mortality
TyG + eGDR vs. TyG 0.678 (0.671–0.684) vs. 0.609 (0.601–0.616) < 0.001 0.620 (0.607–0.634) vs. 0.558 (0.545–0.571)
TyG + eGDR vs. eGDR 0.678 (0.671–0.684) vs. 0.672 (0.665–0.679) < 0.001 0.620 (0.607–0.634) vs. 0.615 (0.602–0.629)
Cardiovascular mortality
TyG + eGDR vs. TyG 0.704 (0.698–0.711) vs. 0.618 (0.611–0.625) < 0.001 0.635 (0.612–0.656) vs. 0.559 (0.537–0.583)
TyG + eGDR vs. eGDR 0.704 (0.698–0.711) vs. 0.700 (0.694–0.707) 0.038 0.635 (0.612–0.656) vs. 0.630 (0.608–0.652)

Abbreviations: eGDR, estimated glucose disposal rate; TyG, triglyceride-glucose

aCovariate-adjusted receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was adjusted for diabetes