Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 25;42(9):955–1002. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01399-3

Table 6.

Model structure: peer-reviewed articles (19 articles)

Study (year) Model structure Health states Structure justification Time horizon Cycle length Source of clinical inputs Source of utility and disutility values Source of HCRU inputs
Aceituno et al. (2018) [20] Markov model

1. Progression free (on treatment)

2. Progression free (off treatment)

3. Progressive disease

4. Death

Markov structure was argued to be appropriate when disease conceptualization necessitated a long-term perspective and entails transitions between distinct health states 25 years 4 weeks Clinical trials and retrospective study Literature Clinical trials
Borg et al. (2016) [54] Simple discrete event simulation model

3 events

1. Stable disease

2. Progressive disease

3. Death

NR Lifetime NR Clinical trials Clinical trials, literature Literature
Cai et al. (2019) [27] Markov model

1. Progression free

2. Progressive disease

3. Death

NR 10 years NR NMA Literature RWE
Campioni et al. (2020 [28] PSM

1. Progression free

2. Progressive disease

3. Death

NR Lifetime (40 years) 4 weeks Clinical trials and real-world data Clinical trials, literature Literature
Carlson et al. (201)8 [29] PSM

1. Progression free

2. Progressive disease

3. Death

NR Lifetime 1 week NMA Literature NR
Dolph et al. (2021) [30] PSM

1. Progression free (on treatment)

2. Progression free (off treatment)

3. Progressive disease

4. Death

NR Lifetime (40 years) 1 week Clinical trials, NMA Clinical trials, literature Literature
Gueneau et al. (2018) [55] NR NR NR NR NR Clinical trials NR NR
Jakubowiak et al. (2016) [31] PSM

1. Progression free (on treatment)

2. Progression free (off treatment)

3. Progressive disease

4. Subsequent lines

5. Best supportive care

6. Death

NR 30 years 4 weeks Clinical trials and real-world data Clinical trials, literature Literature
Jakubowiak et al. (2017) [32] PSM

1. Progression free (on treatment)

2. Progression free (off treatment)

3. Progressive disease

4. Death

NR 30 years 4 weeks Clinical trials Clinical trials, literature NR
Kapinos et al. (2023) [33] Monte Carlo Markov Chain

For CAR-T:

1. Complete response

2. Minimal response

3. No response

4. Progressive disease

For belamaf:

1. Complete response

2. Minimal response

3. Progressive disease

Within each state, patients could either die or survive

NR Lifetime Monthly Clinical trialsa Literature NR
Karampampa et al. (2023) [56] PSM

1. Progression free

2. Progressive disease

3. Death

In line with previous economic evaluations and health technology assessments of treatments for RRMM Lifetime (15 years) Monthly Clinical trials and real-world data Clinical trials, literature Clinical expert opinion
Matsela et al. (2022) [21] Markov model

1. Progression free

2. Progressive disease

3. Death

NR Lifetime (15 years) 4 weeks Clinical trials, NMA Literature Literature
Nikolaou et al. (2021) [57] PSM

1. Progression free (on treatment)

2. Progression free (off treatment)

3. Progressive disease

4. Death

NR 10 years 1 week Clinical trials, MAIC Clinical trials, literature Clinical expert opinion
Patel et al. (2021) [34] Markov model (treatment sequencing)

1. Second-line treatment (either SVd or Vd)

2. Third-line treatment

3. Fourth-line treatment

4. Best supportive care

5. Death

NR Lifetime Monthly Clinical trials Literature Literature
Pelligra et al. (2017) [68] NR

1. Progression free

2. Progressive disease

3. Death

NR 3 years 4 weeks Clinical trials and MAIC Clinical trial and mixed-effect model Literature
Wong et al. (2021) [35] PSM

1. Progression free

2. Progressive disease

3. Death

NR 10 years 1 week Clinical trials Literature Clinical trials, literature
Zeng et al. (2020) [36] Markov model

1. Stable disease

2. Progressive disease

3. Death

NR Lifetime 3 weeks Clinical trials Literature NR
Zhang et al. (2018) [37] Semi-Markov model

1. Progression free

2. Progressive disease

3. Death

NR 10 years 4 weeks Clinical trialsa Literature NR

belamaf belantamab-mafodotin, CAR-T chimeric antigen receptor T-cell, HCRU healthcare resource use, MAIC matching-adjusted indirect comparison, NMA network meta-analysis, NR not reported, PSM partitioned survival model, RRMM relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, RWE real-world evidence, SVd selinexor plus bortezomib and dexamethasone, Vd bortezomib and dexamethasone

aModels that provided more than one clinical trial as sources for clinical inputs but did not provide any further information regarding how these sources were incorporated in the calculations