Table-3.

Assessment of participants’ attitude level regarding the usage of vaccines for small ruminant diseases.

Variables	Categories	Frequency (n = 228)	Proportion (%)	p-value
A1. Vaccines for small ruminants’ diseases are easily available
	Agree	116	50.9	0.791
	Disagree	112	49.1
A2. Do you think a single vaccine gives a small ruminants lifelong immunity?
	Agree	87	38.2
	Disagree	141	61.8
A3. Should one vaccine provide equal protection against all small ruminant’s diseases?
	Agree	93	40.8	0.005
	Disagree	135	59.2
A4. Small ruminants’ vaccines are more expensive than other disease preventive methods
	Agree	165	82.4	0.000
	Disagree	63	27.6
A5. Should all herds be protected if some small ruminants are vaccinated, and some are not?
	Agree	69	30.3	0.000
	Disagree	159	69.7
A6. The government should allocate funding for small ruminants’ vaccines
	Agree	81	35.5	0.000
	Disagree	147	64.5
A7. Vaccination can reduce the need for antibiotics in small ruminants
	Agree	145	63.6	0.003
	Disagree	83	36.4
A8. Use of vaccine is necessary to improve the productivity and welfare of small ruminants
	Agree	96	42.1	0.017
	Disagree	132	57.9
A9. A highly effective vaccine is important
	Agree	148	60.7	0.000
	Disagree	80	35.08
A10.Healthy small ruminants are less likely to get sick if given vaccine
	Agree	150	65.8	0.000
	Disagree	78	34.2
A11. Vaccines are generally used in human and animals because it is safe
	Agree	158	69.3	0.000
	Disagree	70	30.7
A12. Large ruminants’ vaccination makes our food safer.
	Agree	91	39.9	0.002
	Disagree	137	60.1
A13. Vaccination increases the sustainability of small ruminants farming
	Agree	86	37.7	0.000
	Disagree	142	62.3