Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 24;102:skae201. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae201

Table 5.

Effects of the feeding strategy (CF vs. PF) through the different cycles on feeding and drinking behaviors defined through the number of visits and time spent in the automaton per day

Strategy Cycle RSD1 P-value
1 2 3 Strategy2 Day2,3 Cycle2 Strategy x Cycle2
CF PF CF PF CF PF
Number of sows 30 21 18 17 9 11
Feeding behavior
Number of visits to the feeder per day
Total 5.5a 5.7ab 5.6ab 5.4a 5.9b 6.7c 1.1 0.147 <0.001 0.228 <0.001
Feeding 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.2 0.411 0.428 0.603 0.519
Non-feeding 4.4a 4.7ab 4.6ab 4.4a 4.8b 5.7c 1.3 0.096 <0.001 0.129 <0.001
Time spent in the feeder per day, min
Total 54.9a 53.2a 63.6b 50.9a 66.5c 57.9ab 3.6 0.949 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Feeding 29.9a 29.9a 33.4b 31.5b 35.9c 29.7a 2.0 0.897 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Non-feeding 24.9ab 23.3a 30.2b 19.5a 30.6b 28.2b 4.5 0.334 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Drinking behavior
Number of visits to the trough per day
Total 10.0b 11.1b 8.9a 7.8a 14.9c 10.7b 1.6 0.840 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Drinking 9.3b 10.0b 8.2a 7.5a 13.0c 10.0b 1.4 0.769 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Non-drinking 0.7b 1.1b 0.7b 0.3a 1.9c 0.7b 1.2 0.900 <0.001 0.455 <0.001
Time spent in the trough per day, min
Total 9.7b 10.0b 7.4a 8.4a 9.7b 9.5b 1.3 0.981 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Drinking 9.5b 9.8b 7.3a 8.3a 9.6b 9.3b 1.3 0.992 <0.001 <0.001 0.010
Non-drinking 0.2b 0.2b 0.1a 0.1a 0.1a 0.2b 0.7 0.800 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Water intake, L/d 13.9b 12.9b 11.4a 10.7a 17.6c 13.6b 1.6 0.810 <0.001 0.622 <0.001

1RSD, residual standard deviation.

2Fixed effects of the variance analysis model, with initial parity of the sow as a covariate.

3From days 3 to 106 of gestation, the following are all followed in the gestating room.

a, b, c, and d values within a row that do not share a common superscript are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05).

CF, conventional feeding, PF, precision feeding.