Table 3.
Examples of Combination BBR with the PTT/PDT Therapy Based on Nano Preparation
| Therapy | Laser | Combined (Drug) | Cellular Model | Carrier | Dosage of Administration in vivo | Effect of Combination | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTT | 808 nm for 5 min (1 W/cm2) |
/ | SMMC-7721, HL-7702. |
Gold mesoporous silica | Inject PBS, FA-JGMSNs (20 mg/kg), JGMSNs-BBR (25 mg/kg), FA-JGMSNs-BBR (25 mg/kg), free BBR (5 mg/kg) every 3 days. | FA-JGMSNs-BBR combining with RT displayed higher tumor inhibition rates than BBR, FA-JGMSNsBBR or FA-JGMSNs with RT. (no data) | [48] |
| 447 nm for 4 min (80 J/cm2) | / | Caski, HaCaT. |
Nanoemulsions | / | Cell viability (24 h)
Caski: 90% HaCaT: 83%
Caski: 27.59% HaCaT: 46.12% |
[98] | |
| 808 nm for 3 min (2W/cm2) | / | A549 | Nanoparticles | 5 mg/kg dose of BBR; Collect 2 mL blood from the femoral artery at 24 h postinjection. |
With the intrinsic anti-cancer potentials of BBR and ZnO, photothermal effects of ZnO NPs induced by laser irradiation can elevate therapeutic efficacies for A549 cells. (no data) | [69] | |
| 785 nm for 5 min (2 W/cm2) | / | HT-29 | Rod-like keratin nanoparticles (KNPs) | / | IC50 (Enough concentration to kill 50% of the cells) (48 h)
|
[99] | |
| 808 nm laser for 5 min (1 W/cm2) | Camptothecin (CPT) | A549 | Supramolecular nanodrugs |
/ | IC50 (at the same dosage)
24 h: 4.49 ± 0.34 μM 48 h: 0.90 ± 0.10 μM 72 h: 0.43 ± 0.10 μM
24 h: 33.71 ± 1.79 μM 48 h: 21.12 ± 4.99 μM 72 h: 14.18 ± 3.72 μM
24 h: 134.30 ± 17.86 μM 48 h: 89.91 ± 12.46 μM 72 h: 72.72 ± 7.83 μM
24 h: 13.65 ± 0.49 μM 48 h: 10.56 ± 3.25 μM 72 h: 6.86 ± 0.48 μM
24 h: 5.93 ± 0.35 μM 48 h: 1.16 ± 0.30 μM 72 h: 0.63 ± 0.10 μM
24 h: 5.48 ± 0.38 μM 48 h: 0.93 ± 0.12 μM 72 h: 0.48 ± 0.06 μM
24 h: 3.06 ± 0.11 μM 48 h: 0.36 ± 0.11 μM 72 h: 0.21 ± 0.08 μM |
[100] | |
| PDT | 447 nm LED for 4 min (1.2 mW/cm2) | / | T98G | PLGA | / | Apoptotic percentages
|
[101] |
| 808 nm laser for 10 min (0.75 W/cm2) | / | A549 | Gold nanoclusters | There is a noticeable reduction in cell viability percentage for cells subjected to AuNC@BBR@Ghost-associated PDT, compared to those treated with bare AuNCs, BBR-associated PDT, and the AuNC@BBR complex-associated PDT. | / | [102] |