Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 25;16(1):2392875. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2024.2392875

Table 1.

Overall differential abundant taxa on genus level of women versus men.

Genus
Relative abundance, %
Women Men P-value Q-value
n = 19 n = 18
Tyzzerella 4 0.02 ± 0.07 0.05 ± 0.07 0.001 0.088*
Clostridium innocuum group 0.39 ± 0.28 0.52 ± 0.26 0.001 0.088*
Ruminococcus gnavus group 0.39 ± 0.42 0.69 ± 0.65 0.003 0.103*
Akkermansia 0.90 ± 1.35 0.32 ± 0.74 0.003 0.103*
Ruminococcaceae UCG-002 2.25 ± 2.33 1.23 ± 1.88 0.007 0.124*
Subdoligranulum 1.28 ± 1.25 0.65 ± 0.74 0.007 0.124*
Veillonella 0.09 ± 0.13 0.14 ± 0.12 0.006 0.124*
Escherichia-Shigella 0.51 ± 0.46 0.77 ± 0.73 0.006 0.124*
Ruminococcaceae uncultured genus 0.56 ± 0.62 0.6 ± 0.63 0.008 0.124*
Lachnospiraceae UCG-004 0.11 ± 0.20 0.04 ± 0.16 0.010 0.129*

Data are presented as mean ± SD relative abundance (%), significance based on Mann-Whitney U testing. *Indicates a significant difference in women and men (Q < 0.2 (= False Discovery Rate adjusted P-value)). The women versus men comparison is based on combined pre- and post-intervention data.