Skip to main content
. 2004 Dec 14;385(Pt 1):189–195. doi: 10.1042/BJ20041149

Table 1. CE and TG levels in large-sized TG-rich remnants, VLDL, LDL and HDL from control, CETPTg, apoCITg and CETPTg/apoCITg mice.

Lipid contents were determined as described in the Experimental section. Values are expressed in mmol/litre and they are the means±S.E.M. for seven (control and CETPTg mice) or five (ApoCITg and CETPTg/apoCITg) animals. The significance between mean values was determined by using ANOVA; ND, not detectable.

Mice
Control CETPTg ApoCITg CETPTg/apoCITg
TG-rich remnants
 CE ND ND 0.16±0.06 1.09±0.42
 TG ND ND 0.66±0.27 1.16±0.40
VLDL
 CE 0.01±0.01 0.03±0.01 0.12±0.03* 0.47±0.08§
 TG 0.15±0.04 0.21±0.06 0.65±0.19 0.86±0.14§
LDL
 CE 0.13±0.01 0.20±0.02 0.45±0.06§ 0.86±0.06§
 TG 0.20±0.02 0.19±0.01 0.61±0.11§ 0.85±0.14§
HDL
 CE 1.08±0.11 0.86±0.08 1.44±0.07*§ 0.70±0.16*
 TG 0.06±0.01 0.09±0.01 0.10±0.03 0.18±0.03§
Ratio of non-HDL to HDL CE 0.14±0.03 0.28±0.02 0.56±0.09 5.92±2.30§
Ratio of HDL CE to TG 14.5±1.4 11.9±2.7 13.2±2.6 4.5±1.4

* P<0.05, significantly different from control mice.

P<0.005, significantly different from control mice.

P<0.05, significantly different from CETPTg mice.

§ P<0.005, significantly different from CETPTg mice.

P<0.05, significantly different from apoCITg mice.

P<0.005, significantly different from apoCITg mice.