Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 28;79(9):822–833. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2023-221071

Table 3.

Clinical details of healthy control subjects and patient with AATD cohorts either receiving or not receiving AAT augmentation therapy from Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Healthy controls AATD without augmentation therapy AATD with augmentation therapy P value
Number of samples 8 6 6
Age, years (mean±SD) 49.1±13.3 53.3±12.2 54.3±8.6 0.6798
Gender (male/female) 5/3 3/3 4/2 0.9845
Baseline plasma AAT (μM) 25.2±5.0 6.7±3.4 14.5±2.8 <0.0001
Former smokers (%) 0 83.3 83.3 0.0022
FEV1 % predicted (%) 55.3±20.5 51.4±15.7 0.5655
FVC % predicted (%) 86.3±12.3 84.4±13.3 0.7218
FEV1/FVC % (%) 55.3±20.5 51.2±9.3 0.5203
DLCO % predicted (%) 61.3±16.9 57.3±15.2 0.6757

Six patients were receiving plasma purified AAT from CSL Behring (Zemaira). HC and patient samples were employed in figure 5B and figure 7B–F. For AATD five out of six samples were used for mRNA and three out of six samples were used for protein expression, determined by sample availability. Descriptive statistical comparisons by groups performed and p values shown.

DLCO, diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC, forced vital capacity (% predicted).