Table 4.
Effect of dietary DMY supplementation on the growth performance of weaned pigs upon ETEC challenge.1
| Items | Treatments2 | SEM | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | ECON | EDMY | |||
| 1–18 d | |||||
| Initial weight, kg | 7.88 | 7.72 | 7.89 | 0.08 | 0.75 |
| Final weight, kg | 12.01 | 11.60 | 12.95 | 0.30 | 0.67 |
| ADFI, g/d | 374.14 | 363.00 | 444.20 | 21.43 | 0.09 |
| ADG, g/d | 222.04 | 219.44 | 281.39 | 15.80 | 0.07 |
| F/G | 1.69 | 1.69 | 1.61 | 0.05 | 0.32 |
| Diarrhea rate, % | 29.61 | 28.73 | 28.33 | 2.31 | 0.71 |
| 19–21 d | |||||
| Initial weight, kg | 11.86 | 11.76 | 12.95 | 0.30 | 0.54 |
| Final weight, kg | 13.03a | 12.04b | 13.78a | 0.34 | <0.01 |
| ADFI, g/d | 353.09 | 315.71 | 385.3 | 17.21 | 0.28 |
| ADG, g/d | 209.72ab | 95.24b | 274.1a | 27.19 | 0.02 |
| F/G | 1.72 | – | 1.48 | 0.57 | 0.10 |
| Diarrhea rate, % | 12.50c | 45.83a | 27.5b | 1.70 | 0.03 |
ADG, average daily gain; ADFI, average daily feed intake; FC, feed conversion ratio.
Data are means of eight replicates per treatment.
CON, pigs were fed with a basal diet; ECON, pigs were fed with a basal diet and challenged by ETEC; EDMY, pigs were fed with a DMY-containing diet and challenged by ETEC.
a,bWithin a row, values with different superscript letters differ (p < 0.05).