Table 2.
Implications of V-V ECMO treatment for PEEP management in patients with severe ARDS
| Implications of V-V ECMO treatment | Implications for PEEP management |
|---|---|
| “Lung rest” strategy | Minimize VILI: Moderate PEEP levels to reduce mechanical power transmission. Inadequate low PEEP can lead to progressive alveolar collapse and increased pulmonary vascular resistance* |
| “Ultraprotective” tidal volume | Reduced transpulmonary pressure: Possible interaction with cyclic alveolar opening and closing (atelectrauma) |
| Very low lung volume due to severe disease | Limit end-tidal overdistension: Necessity of high airway pressures for significant recruitment* |
| High ventilation inhomogeneity | Highly variable recruitability: Possible paradoxical effects with higher PEEP levels* |
| Gas exchange primarily through V-V ECMO | Extracorporeal gas exchange: Reduced dependence on PEEP to ensure oxygenation |
| Right ventricular unloading* | Potential for moderate PEEP: Moderate PEEP to target lower airway pressures during acute cor pulmonale |
V-V ECMO, veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; VILI, ventilator-induced lung injury
* Individual responses to “ultraprotective” ventilation can vary, and effects such as lung recruitment and right ventricular unloading may be influenced by patient-specific factors