Table 2.
Adherence to Guba and Lincoln Standards for trustworthiness in this study
| Standard | Description |
|---|---|
| Credibility | Researchers conducted member checking with a subset of 5 participants, who reviewed 5 randomly selected reflection paper transcripts to verify the accuracy of interpretations. Peer debriefing was also used to discuss coding processes and challenge biases. |
| Confirmability | An audit trail was maintained, documenting data collection procedures, coding decisions, and theme development, allowing for external verification of the findings. |
| Dependability | Researchers followed a structured qualitative coding protocol, involving initial independent coding of a subset of papers, joint review, code refinement, and ongoing collaborative coding and discussion to ensure consistency. |
| Transferability | Rich descriptions of the research setting, participant characteristics, and data collection/analysis procedures were provided, allowing readers to assess the applicability of findings to other contexts. |