Konig 1984 Fen 0.4.
Methods | Study design: Randomized, double blind, cross over Study location: United States Wash‐out: Not reported Exercise challenge: Treadmill up to 90% of max HR Criteria for EIB diagnosis: Asthma according to ATS; FEV1 fall >20% after exercise challenge |
|
Participants | Number of subjects: 12 % of males: 100% Age range: 17‐29 years Ethnicity: Not reported Withdrawal or drop out: 0 |
|
Interventions | Drug administration: Single dose Time of exercise challenge after drug administration: 10 min, 2 hours, 4 hours Intervention: Fenoterol 40 mcg; Fenoterol 80 mcg Control: Placebo Other drug arms: No Concomitant inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatment: Allowed |
|
Outcomes | Primary available: Max FEV1 % fall; % protection Secondary available: Max FEF 25‐‐75 % fall; Side effects; Number of patients with a max FEV1 % fall <10%; |
|
Notes | Industry funded study | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Double blind study |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Data for max FEF 25‐‐75 % fall not reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Insufficient information |