Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 27;13:92. doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01448-8

Table 2.

Overview of MRSA transmissions and incidental findings among screened contacts, sorted by setting and hospital

Type of contact No. contacts No. likely transmissions No. incidental findings NNS Transmission rate (%) CI 95%
All contacts* 27,377 41 72 667 0.15% 0.11–0.20%
HCW Clinic total 15,874 19 22 835 0.12% 0.07–0.2%
HCW Clinic LUMC 5648 8 8 706 0.14%
HCW Clinic Haga 6935 10 14 694 0.14%
HCW Clinic RdGG 3291 1 3 3291 0.03%
HCW Outpatient total 2834 0 4 >0.001–0.09%
HCW Outpatient LUMC 712 0 0
HCW Outpatient Haga 1751 0 4
HCW Outpatient RdGG 371 0 0
Patient total 4816 22 37 219 0.46% 0.29–0.68%
Patient LUMC 454 6 0 76 1.32%
Patient Haga 4054 13 37 312 0.32%
Patient RdGG 308 3 0 103 0.97%
HCW unspecified 2780 0 8
Non-specified 1073 0 1

* ‘All contacts’ include 2780 HCW with unknown setting and 1073 contacts of unknown type.

For the 2780 HCW of unknown type, it was unclear if the contact occurred in an outpatient or ward setting. Similarly, no information was recorded for the unknown type contacts regarding the setting or whether they involved patients or HCW.

HCW Clinic: inpatient setting on the ward, HCW Outpatient: outpatient setting, Patient: patient-to-patient contacts, Number of Transmissions/Incidental Findings: This number is based on a comparison between the typing results of the detected MRSA isolates from the index cases and from their contacts. All matching isolates are considered likely transmissions, while the remaining cases are classified as incidental findings.

NNS: Number of contacts needed to screen to detect one transmission.

“–“indicates not applicable.

CI 95%: The accuracy of the proportions of transmission to contacts as calculated by means of Jeffrey’s method