Skip to main content
. 2024 May 24;50(5):1039–1049. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbae072

Table 1.

Characteristics of the Incidence Sample and the Setting-Level Variables per Catchment Area

Catchment Area Incidence Sample Setting-Level Variables
All FEP In Controls In Population
Cases, N (% of Total Across Catchment Areas) Women, N (%)a Age-at-First-Contact <35 (y), N (%)a Migrant/Ethnic Minority Groups,N (%)a Daily Cannabis, %b High-Potency Cannabis, %b Unemployment, % Owner-Occupancy, % Population Density, People per km2
England
 Southeast London 262 (10.7) 121 (46.2) 144 (55.0) 201 (76.7) 12.5 26.5 5.3 35.0 6162.3
 Cambridgeshire 266 (10.8) 115 (43.2) 187 (70.3) 103 (38.7) 3.4 9.5 3.0 67.0 241.5
The Netherlands
 Amsterdam 293 (11.9) 104 (35.5) 175 (59.7) 204 (69.6) 14.8 54.3 4.0 46.3 4908.0
 Gouda and Voorhoutc 166 (6.7) 65 (39.2) 111 (66.9) 40 (24.1) 4.6 19.2 4.3 58.7 4208.0
Spain
 Madrid 88 (3.6) 30 (34.1) 51 (58.0) 12 (13.6) 14.4 13.7 13.0 76.8 4997.2
 Barcelona 108 (4.4) 46 (42.6) 78 (72.2) 26 (24.1) 15.5 19.9 14.0 74.3 12 326.5
 Valenciac 59 (2.4) 27 (45.8) 38 (64.4) 10 (16.9) 10.3 12.0 17.7 82.7 14 468.0
 Oviedoc 82 (3.3) 42 (51.2) 44 (53.7) 15 (18.3) 3.2 4.3 13.1 79.9 141.9
 Santiagoc 36 (1.5) 15 (41.7) 18 (50.0) 1 (2.8) 0.0 0.0 13.8 77.9 102.2
 Cuencac 27 (1.1) 6 (22.2) 20 (74.1) 7 (25.9) 2.7 3.8 17.0 81.9 11.6
France
 Val-de-Marne 210 (8.5) 102 (48.6) 124 (59.0) 67 (31.9) 11.9 20.4 4.2 47.6 3721.3
Italy
 Bolognac 165 (6.7) 79 (47.9) 107 (64.8) 49 (29.7) 1.1 8.5 3.2 71.4 2744.0
 Palermo 179 (7.3) 79 (44.1) 114 (63.7) 22 (12.3) 3.4 4.4 8.3 70.2 4200.0
Brazil
 Ribeirão Preto 519 (21.1) 249 (48.0) 308 (59.3) 242 (46.6) 7.2 2.1 4.4 80.8 145.2
Total 2460 (100) 1080 (43.9) 1519 (61.7) 999 (40.6) NA NA NA NA NA
Meand (SD) NA NA NA NA 7.2 (5.7–8.7) 12.2 (10.4–14.0) 9.0 (5.5) 67.9 (15.2) 4169.8 (4486.8)

Note: FEP, first-episode psychosis; IQR, interquartile range; NA, not applicable.

aPer catchment area.

bFollowing multiple imputation by chained equations (supplement 2) to impute missing cannabis use data among controls, with poststratification weights applied (supplement 3).

cExcluded from 8-setting analyses, which were restricted to settings with a maximum of 10% missing data on cannabis use in the control sample.

dSetting-level mean and SD, except cannabis use variables which show weighted mean cannabis use in controls and 95% CIs following multiple imputation across imputed datasets.