Skip to main content
. 2024 May 24;50(5):1039–1049. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbae072

Table 2.

Univariable and Multivariable Random Intercepts Negative Binomial Regression of the Association Between Setting-Level Characteristics and All FEP, Non-affective Psychotic Disorders, and Affective Psychotic Disorders Incidence

Setting-Level Variablea All FEP Non-affective Psychotic Disorders Affective Psychotic Disorders
Univariable IRR (95% CI) Multivariable IRR (95% CI)c Univariable IRR (95% CI) Multivariable IRR (95% CI)c Univariable IRR (95% CI) Multivariable IRR (95% CI)c
% owner-occupancy 0.65 (0.56–0.75) 0.76 (0.61–0.95) 0.63 (0.55–0.72) 0.68 (0.55–0.83) 0.65 (0.43–0.99) 1.07 (0.70–1.64)
% daily cannabis (controls)b 1.34 (1.04–1.73) 1.19 (0.96–1.48) 1.38 (1.07–1.78) 1.06 (0.86–1.30) 1.18 (0.72–1.92) 1.53 (1.02–2.31)
% high-potency cannabis (controls)b 1.50 (1.23–1.82) 1.03 (0.82–1.29) 1.56 (1.31–1.87) 1.12 (0.91–1.38) 1.39 (0.88–2.20) 0.82 (0.54–1.26)
% unemployment 0.73 (0.58–0.92) 0.94 (0.77–1.14) 0.79 (0.60–1.03) 1.11 (0.92–1.33) 0.48 (0.35–0.65) 0.48 (0.32–0.72)
Population density (people per km2) 1.04 (0.78–1.38) 0.92 (0.77–1.11) 1.12 (0.84–1.49) 0.97 (0.82–1.16) 0.78 (0.49–1.24) 0.80 (0.53–1.20)

Note: FEP, first-episode psychosis; IRR, incidence rate ratio.

Bold: P < .05 statistically significant.

a Z-standardized; IRR associated with 1 SD changes.

bSetting-level proportion of daily- or high-potency cannabis use reported by controls with multiple imputation and poststratification weights applied (see supplements 2 and 3 for methods).

cAdjusted for age, sex, age-sex interaction, migrant/ethnic group, and all other variables in the table.