Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 28;10:200. doi: 10.1186/s40792-024-02001-w

Table 1.

Patient characteristics

Case Age Sex Histological classificationa CPSb HER2 Pre-IC
cTNMc
Pre-IC
cStagec
Post-IC
ycTNMd
Post-IC
ycStaged
1 62 M por2 >  > sig CPS < 1 Negative T4bN0M0 IVA T3N0M0 IIB
2 65 M por2 > por1 + tub2 1 < CPS < 5 Negative T4aN2M0 III T4aN1M0 III
3 81 M por1 CPS ≥ 5 Negative T4aN2M0 III T4aN1M0 III
4 60 M por1 >  > tub2 not examined Negative T4bN0M0 IVA T4aN0M0 IIB
5 72 M por CPS ≥ 10 Negative T4bN1M0 IVA T3N0M0 IIB

por1 poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, solid type, por2 poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, non-solid type, sig signet-ring cell carcinoma, tub2 tubular adenocarcinoma, moderately differentiated type, CPS combined positive score, HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, IC induction chemotherapy

aHistological classification: Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma, 3rd English edition [23]

bCPS: score of programmed cell death ligand 1 expression in tumors, calculated by immunohistochemistry

ccTNM/cStage: clinical classification according to the Union for International Cancer Control TNM classification of malignant tumours, 8th edition

dycTNM/ycStage: clinical classification after perioperative therapy according to the Union for International Cancer Control TNM classification of malignant tumours, 8th edition