Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 28;20(8):5132–5142. doi: 10.1002/alz.13909

TABLE 3.

Cox proportional hazards regression based on clinical progression over time using three different models.

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
HR (95% CI) p‐value HR (95% CI) p‐value HR (95% CI) p‐value
Outcome: Dementia
Whole sample 6.53 (2.84–15.03) <0.001 6.51 (2.76–15.34) <0.001 4.38 (1.77–10.85) 0.001
MCI group 2.76 (1.12–6.82) 0.028 3.28 (1.29–8.37) 0.013 2.49 (0.87–7.17) 0.09
Outcome: MCI
Control group 3.05 (0.76–12.20) 0.115 3.75 (0.90–15.64) 0.07 4.62 (1.05–20.28) 0.043
SCD group 2.10 (1.29–3.44) 0.003 1.78 (1.04–3.04) 0.035 1.58 (0.90–2.77) 0.11

Notes: Results of Cox proportional hazards regression models analyzing the association between low baseline Aβ42/Aβ40 IP eluates from plasma and the risk of clinical progression to dementia (whole sample, MCI group) or MCI (control group, SCD group). Model 1: no covariate adjustment; Model 2: adjusted for baseline age, sex, and years of education; Model 3: additional adjustment for APOE ε4 status.

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; SCD, subjective cognitive decline.