Table 2.

Range, median, and IQR of the scores of the survey domains^a.

Items				Scores, median (IQR; range)
Perception
	Knowledge			2.00 (1.00-3.00; 1-5)
	Beliefs of perceived risk
		“I think my job could be replaced in the future because of AI.”	3.00 (1.50-4.50; 1-5)
		“In the future, ChatGPT (or some similar technology) will play an even more important role in my job.”	4.00 (3.50-4.50; 1-5)
		“Using AI like ChatGPT in clinical practice raises ethical concerns.”	4.00 (3.50-4.50; 1-5)
		Total median score	3.28 (2.76-3.81; 1-5)
	Ethics
		Revising the language of a scientific manuscript	2.00 (1.00-3.00; 1-5)
		Writing text in a scientific manuscript	3.00 (2.50-3.50; 1-5)
		The sole source of information for clinical practice	3.00 (2.00-4.00; 1-5)
		Total median score	2.61 (2.11-3.11; 1-5)
Attitudes
	I think that ChatGPT makes my job easier.			4.00 (3.48-4.52; 1-5)
	ChatGPT can be beneficial in health care settings.			4.00 (3.00-5.00; 1-5)
	ChatGPT provides trustworthy health care information or guidance.			4.00 (3.50-4.50; 1-5)
	ChatGPT is a useful tool when I need to search for information on specific medical questions.			4.00 (3.00-5.00; 1-5)
	ChatGPT is a useful tool when I need to search for medical literature.			4.00 (3.00-5.00; 1-5)
	Total median score			3.89 (3.44-4.34; 1-5)
Use
	Frequency of use			2.00 (1.00-3.00; 1-5)

^an=1519, which corresponds to students who were aware of ChatGPT.