Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 23;11(8):ENEURO.0135-24.2024. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0135-24.2024

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Individual changes in wave V peak amplitudes and latencies. The wave V changes for the click ERPs and subcortical TRFs are shown in each column. Top row: latency changes, with boxplots across participants and each line denoting individual participants. Participants that have a smaller latency for the highest intensity compared to the lowest intensity (i.e., the expected trend) are shown in green and others are shown in red. Bottom row: amplitude changes for each intensity. Participants that have a larger amplitude for the highest intensity compared to the lowest intensity (i.e., the expected trend) are shown in green and others are shown in red. Note that the amplitude effects for OSSA and ZIL are probably mainly due to the normalization across levels. It is clear that GT performs the best in terms of both latency and amplitude effects.