Table 1.
Author | Study Purpose | Study Design | Country/Research Area | Study Results |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adejumo et al. (2021) [30] | To assess the GBV experience of IDP women in their camp | Quantitative cross-sectional study involving 288 women IDPs in Edo State, Nigeria | Edo State, Southern Nigeria |
|
Agbaje, F.I. (2020) [31] | To examine ways the Boko Haram group objectified the female body and factors fueling such action | Qualitative study adopting FGDs with 50 girls and IdIs with two officials at two IDP camps in Abuja, Nigeria | North-eastern Nigeria |
|
Alhassan et al. (2019) [32] | To investigate the influence of the intensity of events, distress disclosure and resilience in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among IDPs in Abuja | Cross-sectional quantitative research design. A convenient sampling technique was adopted to randomly select 55 participants for the study | Abuja, Nigeria |
|
Bawa et al. (2022) [33] | To examine the impact of violence and forced displacement on female education | Mixed methods: quantitative and qualitative research designs were adopted | North-eastern Nigeria |
|
Bermudez et al. (2018) [34] | To examine the nature of violence against adolescents in Kiziba Camp, Rwanda | Qualitative study adopting FGDs | Rwanda |
|
Erhardt-Ohren and Lewinger (2020) [9] | To gauge the knowledge of refugees and IDPs on abortion, attitude and practices in LMICs | Qualitative research design | Displaced persons’ camps in LMICs |
|
Hossain et al. (2020) [35] | To examine the relationship between disability, experience of GBV and mental health among refugee women | Cross-sectional quantitative research design | Kenya |
|
Iyakaremye and Mukagatare (2016) [36] | To examine the nexus between forced migration and sexual abuse, particularly among adolescent girls | Qualitative research design using FGDs and IdIs | Kikeme Refugee Camp, Rwanda |
|
Murphy et al. (2020) [37] | To examine disclosure and help-seeking behaviours of survivors of SV | Cross-sectional quantitative survey | South Sudan |
|
Murray et al. (2021) [38] | To provide valid measures for sexual violence stigma for incorporation into monitoring and evaluation programmes in humanitarian settings | Cross-sectional quantitative research design | Somalia and Syria |
|
Nara et al. (2019) [4] | To assess the reproductive health needs of displaced Congolese women in camps | Multi-method qualitative study | Uganda |
|
Obiefuna and Adams (2021) [39] | To investigate the response of religious associations to humanitarian crises faced by female IDPs in NE Nigeria | Mixed methods: quantitative and qualitative research designs were adopted | Borno State, Nigeria |
|
Oladeji et al. (2021) [6] | To report on the disclosure and outcomes of sexual violence-related pregnancies (SVRP) | Snowball technique was adopted to identify women with SVRP | North-eastern Nigeria |
|
Pham et al. (2020) [40] | To access the magnitude of SV and trust in the judicial system to prosecute offenders | Adopted a qualitative research design. Interviews were conducted in 4 waves among 25,143 adults resident in humanitarian settings in the Central African Republic between 2017 and 2018 | Central African Republic (CAR) |
|
Stark et al. (2017) [41] | To compare disclosure behaviours of the sexually violated between individual and group reporting | A mixed methods research design was adopted for this study. Quantitative data were obtained from 1788 IDP girls and adolescents in Sudan and Ethiopia. For qualitative sources, data were obtained from 165 adolescent girls across 28 camps in Ethiopia and Sudan, comprising 5 or 6 girls in each group | Congo DRC and Ethiopia |
|
Tran et al. (2021) [42] | Capacity training to strengthen healthcare providers’ capacity to provide safe abortion and post-abortion care services in humanitarian settings | Mixed methods: quantitative and qualitative research design | Congo DRC, Nigeria and Uganda |
|
Williams et al. (2018) [43] | To identify existing social and economic vulnerabilities of female adolescents in refugee camps in Rwanda |
Qualitative study using FGDs and KIIs | Rwanda |
|
Woldetsadik et al. (2022) [44] | To understand women’s perceptions of and experiences with conflict-related sexual violence (CRSV), especially the health and social challenges they constitute | Qualitative research design with the adoption of in-depth interviews (IdIs) to elicit data | Northern Uganda |
|
Note: SV: Sexual violence; IPV: Intimate partner violence; NPSV: Non-partner sexual violence; Congo DRC: Democratic Republic of the Congo; FGD: Focus group discussion; IdI: In-depth interview; KII: Key in-depth interview; GBV: Gender-based violence; PTSD: Post-traumatic stress disorder; LMICs: Low- and middle-income countries; SVRP: Sexual violence-related pregnancy.