Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 4;2021(1):CD013229. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013229.pub2

9. Key characteristics of evaluations included in brief economic commentary.

Study ID Country Evaluation type Analysis type
An 2010 USA Observational study‐based Cost‐effectiveness
Barnett 2013 USA Model‐based Cost‐effectiveness and cost‐utility
Bauld 2011 UK Model‐based Cost‐effectiveness and cost‐utility
Begh 2011 UK Trial‐based Cost‐utility
Berndt 2016 Netherlands Trial‐based Cost‐effectiveness and cost‐utility
Boyd 2009 USA Model‐based Cost‐effectiveness
Calhoun 2016 USA Trial‐based Cost‐effectiveness and cost‐utility
Cromwell 2001 USA Model‐based Cost‐effectiveness and cost‐utility
Dino 2008 USA Model‐based Cost‐effectiveness
Feenstra 2005 Netherlands Model‐based Cost‐effectiveness and cost‐utility
Gilbert 2017 UK Trial‐based Cost‐effectiveness and cost‐utility
Healey 2019 UK Model‐based Cost‐effectiveness and cost‐utility
Javitz 2011 USA Trial and model‐based Cost‐effectiveness and cost‐utility
Lal 2014 Australia Model‐based Cost‐effectiveness
McGhan 1996 USA Model‐based Cost‐effectiveness
Mudde 1996 Netherlands Observational study‐based Cost‐effectiveness
Nohlert 2013 Sweden Trial and model‐based Cost‐effectiveness and cost‐utility
Popp 2018 USA Trial and model‐based Cost‐effectiveness and cost‐utility
Ruger 2008 USA Trial‐based Cost‐effectiveness and cost‐utility
Shearer 2006 Australia Model‐based Cost‐effectiveness
Smit 2013 Netherlands Trial‐based Cost‐effectiveness and cost‐utility
Tosanguan 2016 Thailand Model‐based Cost‐utility
Wu 2018 UK Trial and model‐based Cost‐effectiveness and cost‐utility