Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 16;13(16):4842. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164842

Table 1.

Comparative studies currently available on the management of CD-associated strictures.

Study Design Strictures Location Treatment
and No of Pts
Technical Success Rate Long-Term Outcomes
(Years fu)
Adverse Events, %
[17] 2017 Retrospective Ileocolic anastomosis 176 EBD
131 surgery
- average time to surgery/re-surgery delayed by 6.45 years in EBD group 1.1 (perforation)
8.8 (~infection)
[18] 2024 Retrospective Duodenal 30 EBD
18 surgery
- 2.96 years recurrence-free
6.31 years recurrence-free, p = 0.01
0.74
16.67
[19] 2018 Retrospective Anastomosis (85.7% ileocolic) 21 ES
164 EBD
100%
89.5%
9.5% surgery (0.8)
33.5% re-surgery (4)
8.8 (bleeding)
1.1 (perforation)
[20] 2019 Retrospective Ileocolic anastomosis 35 ES
147 ICR
- 11.3% surgery (0.8)
10.2% re-surgery (2.2), p = 0.83
10.2 (~bleeding)
31.9 (~ileus)
[21] 2020 Retrospective Distal ileum, ileocecal valve 13 ES
32 ICR
100%
100%
15.4% surgery (1.8)
18.8% re-surgery (1.5), p = 0.79
6,9 (perforation)
25 (~infection)
[22] 2022 Randomized trial - 41 EBD
39 FCSEMS
- 80% no re-intervention (1)
51% no re-intervention (1), p = 0.0061
2 (perforation)
3 (perforation)

ES, endoscopic electroincision; EBD, endoscopic balloon dilation; FCSEMS, fully-covered self-expandable metallic stents; fu, follow-up ICR, ileocolic resection; p, p-value; pts, patients; ~, most frequent.