Table 3.
Comparison of first eight frequencies of CSP-TCH under other three BCs, as predicted by 3D-FEA and 2D-ERM (unit: Hz).
| Order | SSCC | FFCC | FFCF | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3D-FEA | 2D-ERM | Error | 3D-FEA | 2D-ERM | Error | 3D-FEA | 2D-ERM | Error | |
| 1 | 307.69 | 319.2 | 3.74% | 174.6 | 180.44 | 3.34% | 27.341 | 28.173 | 3.04% |
| 2 | 625.05 | 649.21 | 3.87% | 239.61 | 248.68 | 3.79% | 90.046 | 93.582 | 3.93% |
| 3 | 799.28 | 835.77 | 4.57% | 480.02 | 498.17 | 3.78% | 169.41 | 174.79 | 3.18% |
| 4 | 1093.3 | 1140.8 | 4.34% | 550.87 | 574.11 | 4.22% | 304.5 | 316.49 | 3.94% |
| 5 | 1093.9 | 1141.7 | 4.37% | 575.86 | 598.89 | 4.00% | 417.53 | 433.94 | 3.93% |
| 6 | 1553.4 | 1623.8 | 4.53% | 912.84 | 952.85 | 4.38% | 485.78 | 503.76 | 3.70% |
| 7 | 1644 | 1736.8 | 5.64% | 938.66 | 979.65 | 4.37% | 622.97 | 647.7 | 3.97% |
| 8 | 1707.6 | 1793.2 | 5.01% | 1046.3 | 1092.8 | 4.44% | 659.57 | 687.86 | 4.29% |