Table 6.

Comparison of effective mass fractions of 3D-FEA and 2D-ERM under four BCs.

BC	Model	Order
		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
CCCC	3D-FEA	49.22%	0	0	8.42%	0	0	0	9.67%
	2D-ERM	49.13%	0	0	8.39%	0	0	0	9.61%
	$\delta$ (%)	0.18	0	0	0.36	0	0	0	0.62
CCSS	3D-FEA	57.15%	0	0	0	9.80%	0	6.65%	0
	2D-ERM	56.59%	0	0	0	9.75%	0	6.57%	0
	$\delta$ (%)	0.28	0	0	0	0.51	0	1.2	0
FFCC	3D-FEA	68.83%	0	0	0.09%	0	0	13.22%	0
	2D-ERM	67.81%	0	0	0.08%	0	0	12.79%	0
	$\delta$ (%)	1.48	0	0	0.08	0	0	3.25	0
FFCF	3D-FEA	61.01%	0	18.85%	0	0.98%	5.59%	0	0.15%
	2D-ERM	60.15%	0	18.78%	0	0.97%	5.56%	0	0.15%
	$\delta$ (%)	1.41	0	0.37	0	1.02	0.54	0	0