Skip to main content
. 2013 May 31;2013(5):CD006285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006285.pub2

Comparison 2. Audiometry improvement.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Average improvement >= 10 dB in pure‐tone audiogram (250 Hz to 2000 Hz) 2   Relative Risk (Random, 95% CI) 0.80 [0.22, 2.88]
2 Pure‐tone threshold 2   Mean difference (Random, 95% CI) 7.02 [‐6.92, 20.96]