Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 29;14:20039. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65942-0

Table 2.

Observed fire day observations, arithmetic and geometric means (standard deviation), and median values for the ground personnel used per fire day pre-COVID and during-COVID for each fire region.

Ground personnel use per pre-COVID fire day Ground personnel use per during-COVID fire day
Fire Region (n total fire days) n Fire Days Arithmetic Mean (SD) Geom. Mean (SD) Median n Fire Days Arithmetic Mean (SD) Geom.Mean (SD) Median Mann–Whitney-Wilcoxon test
Southern CA (n = 2628) 1512 766 (321) 253 (6) 344.5 1116 231 (282) 81 (7) 133.5 p < 0.001
Southwest (n = 2037) 897 135 (156) 64 (4) 79 1140 65 (91) 23 (6) 37 p < 0.001
Great Basin (n = 3002) 1607 136 (158) 59 (5) 89 1395 70 (102) 27 (5) 41 p < 0.001
Northern CA (n = 3038) 1582 783 (870) 361 (5) 443 1456 456 (559) 196 (5) 289 p < 0.001
Northern Rockies (n = 3967) 1807 99 (105) 39 (6) 64 2160 65 (67) 27 (5) 41 p < 0.001
Rocky Mountains (n = 1917) 1040 129 (156) 42 (7) 82 877 104 (146) 32 (6) 53 P < 0.001
Northwest (n = 4650) 2234 219 (244) 91 (5) 132 2416 178 (190) 81 (5) 122 p < 0.001

The fire regions are ordered by the observed change in the arithmetic mean ground personnel use per fire day for pre-COVID to during-COVID fire days. The null hypothesis for the Mann–Whitney-Wilcoxon test posited that the median ground personnel used/fire day were equal for pre- and during-COVID fire days, and the alternative hypothesis posited that the median ground personnel used/fire day during-COVID would be less than the pre-COVID mean and median.