Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 17;13(16):2288. doi: 10.3390/plants13162288

Table 3.

Content of macro- and micronutrients in dried tomato fruits varied according to different strategies of multi-nutrient fertilizer application containing selenium, assessed at each harvest.

Tomato Harvest 1 (1st, 2nd, and 3rd Bunches)
Treatment N P K Ca Mg S Fe Cu Mn Zn B
______________________________ (g kg−1) ________________________________ _____________________________ (mg kg−1) _____________________________
T1 34.2 ± 1.3 5.8 ± 0.4 33.4 ± 6.6 2.5 ± 0.3 2.5 ± 0.3 2.7 ± 0.3 92.5 ± 6.8 31.6 ± 1.1 b 21.9 ± 0.9 36.5 ± 4.6 18.4 ± 3.2
T2 33.0 ± 1.2 6.2 ± 0.8 58.1 ± 5.4 2.8 ± 0.3 2.5 ± 0.3 2.9 ± 0.4 77.2 ± 8.8 33.3 ± 4.6 b 22.8 ± 2.0 37.3 ± 4.7 19.1 ± 2.4
T3 34.1 ± 1.6 5.9 ± 0.4 42.5 ± 9.4 2.6 ± 0.1 2.6 ± 0.1 2.8 ± 0.1 103.1 ± 4.6 48.3 ± 2.2 a 23.1 ± 1.3 44.0 ± 2.3 18.4 ± 0.7
T4 34.0 ± 1.3 6.7 ± 0.5 38.6 ± 10.5 2.7 ± 0.4 2.7 ± 0.3 3.1 ± 0.3 83.1 ± 8.6 43.2 ± 5.0 a 21.2 ± 1.3 42.6 ± 4.9 19.8 ± 2.3
T5 32.2 ± 1.3 6.6 ± 0.3 42.6 ± 7.9 2.8 ± 0.4 2.6 ± 0.1 3.1 ± 0.2 97.3 ± 7.1 32.0 ± 2.0 b 21.7 ± 0.7 39.4 ± 2.3 20.1 ± 1.2
p-value 0.530 NS 0.647 NS 0.367 NS 0.966 NS 0.923 NS 0.900 NS 0.160 NS 0.001 * 0.788 NS 0.555 NS 0.967 NS
Treatment N P K Ca Mg S Fe Cu Mn Zn B
______________________________ (g kg−1) ________________________________ _____________________________ (mg kg−1) _____________________________
T1 21.7 ± 0.5 b 3.5 ± 0.2 41.6 ± 1.6 1.7 ± 0.1 2.1 ± 0.1 2.1 ± 0.1 64.7 ± 2.4 16.0 ± 1.2 15.6 ± 0.5 23.3 ± 0.9 13.0 ± 0.7 b
T2 23.1 ± 1.8 b 4.1 ± 0.2 47.7 ± 1.2 1.9 ± 0.1 2.5 ± 0.1 2.3 ± 0.1 63.9 ± 1.7 16.5 ± 2.7 19.4 ± 1.4 26.3 ± 1.8 16.6 ± 0.9 a
T3 22.8 ± 1.0 b 3.4 ± 0.2 44.3 ± 1.3 1.7 ± 0.1 2.3 ± 0.1 2.2 ± 0.1 57.6 ± 2.2 12.7 ± 1.2 16.2 ± 0.5 22.7 ± 0.8 14.8 ± 0.3 ab
T4 21.8 ± 1.5 b 3.8 ± 0.3 42.8 ± 2.8 1.8 ± 0.1 2.3 ± 0.3 2.3 ± 0.3 58.0 ± 4.1 13.1 ± 2.0 16.7 ± 1.3 24.6 ± 2.9 14.9 ± 1.3 ab
T5 28.7 ± 1.3 a 4.2 ± 0.3 46.6 ± 2.8 2.1 ± 0.1 2.5 ± 0.2 2.5 ± 0.1 64.6 ± 1.2 13.9 ± 1.9 18.2 ± 0.9 26.7 ± 2.5 17.6 ± 1.0 a
p-value 0.015 * 0.125 NS 0.260 NS 0.073 NS 0.257 NS 0.488 NS 0.154 NS 0.430 NS 0.062 0.563 NS 0.018 *
Treatment N P K Ca Mg S Fe Cu Mn Zn B
______________________________ (g kg−1) ________________________________ _____________________________ (mg kg−1) _____________________________
T1 24.2 ± 1.9 3.3 ± 0.3 38.1 ± 1.6 1.8 ± 0.2 2.4 ± 0.2 2.0 ± 0.2 73.9 ± 2.1 6.1 ± 0.8 17.0 ± 0.9 17.7 ± 1.5 b 13.7 ± 0.6
T2 24.6 ± 1.5 3.3 ± 0.1 35.9 ± 1.6 1.9 ± 0.1 2.4 ± 0.1 2.0 ± 0.1 74.1 ± 8.4 12.0 ± 2.3 17.4 ± 1.3 20.2 ± 1.0 b 14.5 ± 0.6
T3 25.2 ± 1.4 3.4 ± 0.3 38.5 ± 2.2 1.8 ± 0.2 2.5 ± 0.2 2.3 ± 0.2 73.0 ± 4.8 7.4 ± 1.0 16.4 ± 0.9 19.9 ± 1.3 b 16.2 ± 0.7
T4 26.9 ± 1.8 4.2 ± 0.4 43.1 ± 1.7 2.0 ± 0.2 2.7 ± 0.2 2.3 ± 0.2 86.4 ± 9.4 10.0 ± 1.6 18.9 ± 1.6 29.4 ± 2.8 a 15.4 ± 1.9
T5 24.5 ± 1.8 3.2 ± 0.3 37.9 ± 1.2 1.7 ± 0.2 2.4 ± 0.2 2.1 ± 0.1 77.7 ± 4.7 10.2 ± 2.5 16.2 ± 1.1 34.1 ± 3.1 a 14.1 ± 0.6
p-value 0.772 NS 0.149 NS 0.102 NS 0.885 NS 0.592 NS 0.495 NS 0.638 NS 0.119 NS 0.592 NS 0.001 * 0.370 NS

T1: Control (without application of multi-nutrient fertilizer (MNF)); T2: Application at the beginning of flowering (2 kg ha−1 of MNF providing 5 g of Se ha−1); T3: Application at the beginning of flowering +3rd bunch (4 kg ha−1 of MNF providing 10 g of Se ha−1); T4: Application at the beginning of flowering +6th bunch (4 kg ha−1 of MNF providing 10 g of Se ha−1); T5: Application at the beginning of flowering +3rd bunch +6th bunch (6 kg ha−1 of MNF providing 15 g of Se ha−1). NS: statistically non-significant (p > 0.05); *: statistically significant (p < 0.05). Means with standard error within each treatment group that shares the same letter in each column are not considered statistically different according to the Duncan test (p > 0.05).