Table 1.

SWOT diagram for 3D-printed customized orthoses.

	3DP-WHOs Based on 3D Scanning	3DP-WHOs Based on Thermoforming
Strengths	Enhanced customization to patient’s hand shape Improved fit and comfort	Efficient production process Cost-effective due to reduced material waste Faster production times Potential for scalable manufacturing and distribution Improved durability and reduced risk of breakage
	Ability to accommodate complex anatomical variations Ability to create complex designs that are challenging with traditional methods Enhanced patient engagement through personalized design Potential for improved functional outcomes and patient satisfaction Potential for reduced complications and re-hospitalizations
Weaknesses	High initial investment in 3D scanning equipment Limited availability of advanced 3D scanning technology Requirement of specialized engineering knowledge to process the patient data and design the orthosis Potential for longer lead times compared to off-the-shelf solutions	Quality control challenges during thermoforming Limited material options for thermoforming Requirement of engineering knowledge to design the orthosis Potential for less precise fit compared to the 3D scanning-based approach
Opportunities	Increased adoption in healthcare Potential to speed up development of bespoke solutions for patients Collaboration with healthcare providers to refine the design and manufacturing process
Threads	Regulatory issues for 3D-printed medical devices Reimbursement challenges for personalized 3D-printed orthotic solutions